Advertisement

Efficacy and Safety of the Remimazolam-Alfentanil Combination for Sedation During Gastroscopy: A Randomized, Double-blind, Single-center Controlled Trial

      ABSTRACT

      Purpose

      Propofol infusion is a popular single drug of choice for sedation in the gastrointestinal endoscopy suite. Drug combinations are more beneficial than single-drug regimens in gastroscopy sedation. However, the cardiopulmonary complications of propofol sedation raise concern. Remimazolam is a novel, ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine sedative, and alfentanil is a weak opioid. During endoscopic procedures, remimazolam is an effective and safe sedative procedure. No synergistic effect has been reported when remimazolam was combined with alfentanil in gastroscopy sedation. Here, we evaluated the effective dose, sedative efficacy, and safety of the remimazolam-alfentanil combination in gastroscopy sedation and compared the results with those of the propofol-alfentanil combination.

      Methods

      This study was conducted in two parts. In Part 1, Dixon's up-and-down method (sequential distribution) was adopted for determining the 95% effective dose (ED95) (95% CI) and 95% CI of remimazolam combined with 5 µg/kg alfentanil. In Part 2, after obtaining the predictive remimazolam ED95, 161 patients were randomized into the remimazolam group (remimazolam-alfentanil) and the propofol group (propofol-alfentanil). The effectiveness of the drug combinations was measured according to successful sedation parameters. Changes in vital signs and the appearance of adverse events were used to assess the safety of drug combinations. Evaluation of patient and physician satisfaction was included as quality indicators of treatment.

      Results

      Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between the 2 parts of the study. The ED95 of remimazolam in inhibiting a positive response to gastroscopy placement into the pharyngeal cavity was 0.33 mg/kg (95% CI, 0.289 to 1.023). The procedure success rate was 97.53% in the remimazolam group and 97.50% in the propofol group. The difference in the success rate of the procedure between the remimazolam and propofol groups was 0.03% (95% CI, –2.5 to 2.4). However, the incidence of injection pain, hypotension, respiratory depression, and dizziness was lower in the remimazolam group compared with the propofol group (P < 0.05). Furthermore, patients from the propofol group were more likely to be drowsy, and their work efficiency was reduced the day after leaving the hospital, whereas patients in the remimazolam group were less affected (P < 0.05).

      Implications

      The ED95 of remimazolam was 0.33 mg/kg when it was combined with alfentanil (5 µg/kg) for gastroscopy sedation. The sedation strategy of remimazolam-alfentanil has noninferior efficacy, fewer adverse effects, and a better postoperative recovery process than propofol-alfentanil for patients undergoing gastroscopy. Chinese Clinical Trials Registry identifier: ChiCTR2100051565.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Therapeutics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Cardia L.
        Remimazolam: an ultrashort-acting intravenous anesthetic suitable for general anesthesia.
        Minerva Anestesiol. 2021; 87: 1059-1063
        • Guan X
        • Jiao Z
        • Gong X
        • et al.
        Efficacy of pre-treatment with remimazolam on prevention of propofol-induced injection pain in patients undergoing abortion or curettage: a prospective, double-blinded, randomized and placebo-controlled clinical trial.
        Drug Des Devel Ther. 2021; 15: 4551-4558
        • Morimoto Y.
        Efficacy and safety profile of remimazolam for sedation in adults undergoing short surgical procedures.
        Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2022; 18: 95-100
        • Worthington MT
        • Antonik LJ
        • Goldwater DR
        • et al.
        A phase Ib, dose-finding study of multiple doses of remimazolam (CNS 7056) in volunteers undergoing colonoscopy.
        Anesth Analg. 2013; 117: 1093-1100
        • Rana MV
        • Desai R
        • Tran L
        • Davis D.
        Perioperative pain control in the ambulatory setting.
        Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2016; 20: 18
        • Stogiannou D
        • Protopapas A
        • Protopapas A
        • Tziomalos K.
        Is propofol the optimal sedative in gastrointestinal endoscopy.
        Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2018; 81: 520-524
        • Liou JY
        • Ting CK
        • Teng WN
        • Mandell MS
        • Tsou MY.
        Adaptation of non-linear mixed amount with zero amount response surface model for analysis of concentration-dependent synergism and safety with midazolam, alfentanil, and propofol sedation.
        Br J Anaesth. 2018; 120: 1209-1218
        • Mazanikov M
        • Udd M
        • Kylänpää L
        • et al.
        Patient-controlled sedation for ERCP: a randomized double-blind comparison of alfentanil and remifentanil.
        Endoscopy. 2012; 44: 487-492
        • Langevin S
        • Lessard MR
        • Trépanier CA
        • Baribault JP.
        Alfentanil causes less postoperative nausea and vomiting than equipotent doses of fentanyl or sufentanil in outpatients.
        Anesthesiology. 1999; 91: 1666-1673
        • Andrews CJ
        • Sinclair M
        • Prys-Roberts C
        • Dye A.
        Ventilatory effects during and after continuous infusion of fentanyl or alfentanil.
        Br J Anaesth. 1983; 55: 211S-216S
        • Pastis NJ
        • Yarmus LB
        • Schippers F
        • et al.
        Safety and efficacy of remimazolam compared with placebo and midazolam for moderate sedation during bronchoscopy.
        Chest. 2019; 155: 137-146
        • Futier E
        • Lefrant JY
        • Guinot PG
        • et al.
        Effect of individualized vs standard blood pressure management strategies on postoperative organ dysfunction among high-risk patients undergoing major surgery: a randomized clinical trial.
        JAMA. 2017; 318: 1346-1357
        • Rudner R
        • Jalowiecki P
        • Kawecki P
        • Gonciarz M
        • Mularczyk A
        • Petelenz M.
        Conscious analgesia/sedation with remifentanil and propofol versus total intravenous anesthesia with fentanyl, midazolam, and propofol for outpatient colonoscopy.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2003; 57: 657-663
        • Görges M
        • Zhou G
        • Brant R
        • Ansermino JM.
        Sequential allocation trial design in anesthesia: an introduction to methods, modeling, and clinical applications.
        Paediatr Anaesth. 2017; 27: 240-247
        • Chen S
        • Wang J
        • Xu X
        • et al.
        The efficacy and safety of remimazolam tosylate versus propofol in patients undergoing colonoscopy: a multicentered, randomized, positive-controlled, phase III clinical trial.
        Am J Transl Res. 2020; 12: 4594-4603
        • Chen SH
        • Yuan TM
        • Zhang J
        • et al.
        Remimazolam tosilate in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a multicenter, randomized, non-inferiority, phase III trial.
        J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021; 36: 474-481
        • Zhang Y
        • Tian M
        • Li SR.
        [Impact of propofol on the optimal sedative depth in patients undergoing gastroscopy].
        Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2007; 87: 44-47
        • Kim KM.
        Remimazolam: pharmacological characteristics and clinical applications in anesthesiology.
        Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2022; 17: 1-11
        • Rex DK
        • Bhandari R
        • Lorch DG
        • Meyers M
        • Schippers F
        • Bernstein D.
        Safety and efficacy of remimazolam in high risk colonoscopy: a randomized trial.
        Dig Liver Dis. 2021; 53: 94-101
        • Liu M
        • Sun Y
        • Zhou L
        • Feng K
        • Wang T
        • Feng X.
        The median effective dose and bispectral index of remimazolam tosilate for anesthesia induction in elderly patients: an up-and-down sequential allocation trial.
        Clin Interv Aging. 2022; 17: 837-843
        • Sidhu R
        • Turnbull D
        • Newton M
        • et al.
        Deep sedation and anaesthesia in complex gastrointestinal endoscopy: a joint position statement endorsed by the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG), Joint Advisory Group (JAG) and Royal College of Anaesthetists (RCoA).
        Frontline Gastroenterol. 2019; 10: 141-147
        • Kay B
        • Pleuvry B.
        Human volunteer studies of alfentanyl (R39209), a new short-acting narcotic analgesic.
        Anaesthesia. 1980; 35: 952-956
        • Sheng XY
        • Liang Y
        • Yang XY
        • et al.
        Safety, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of single ascending dose and continuous infusion of remimazolam besylate in healthy Chinese volunteers.
        Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2020; 76: 383-391
        • Zhang S
        • Wang J
        • Ran R
        • Peng Y
        • Xiao Y.
        Efficacy and safety of remimazolam tosylate in hysteroscopy: a randomized, single-blind, parallel controlled trial.
        J Clin Pharm Ther. 2022; 47: 55-60
        • Doi M
        • Morita K
        • Takeda J
        • Sakamoto A
        • Yamakage M
        • Suzuki T.
        Efficacy and safety of remimazolam versus propofol for general anesthesia: a multicenter, single-blind, randomized, parallel-group, phase IIb/III trial.
        J Anesth. 2020; 34: 543-553
        • Dai G
        • Pei L
        • Duan F
        • et al.
        Safety and efficacy of remimazolam compared with propofol in induction of general anesthesia.
        Minerva Anestesiol. 2021; 87: 1073-1079
        • Mao Y
        • Guo J
        • Yuan J
        • Zhao E
        • Yang J.
        Quality of recovery after general anesthesia with remimazolam in patients' undergoing urologic surgery: a randomized controlled trial comparing remimazolam with propofol.
        Drug Des Devel Ther. 2022; 16: 1199-1209
        • Schüttler J
        • Eisenried A
        • Lerch M
        • Fechner J
        • Jeleazcov C
        • Ihmsen H.
        Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remimazolam (CNS 7056) after continuous infusion in healthy male volunteers: Part I. Pharmacokinetics and clinical pharmacodynamics.
        Anesthesiology. 2020; 132: 636-651
        • Kilpatrick GJ.
        Remimazolam: non-clinical and clinical profile of a new sedative-anesthetic agent.
        Front Pharmacol. 2021; 12690875
        • Zhu X
        • Wang H
        • Yuan S
        • et al.
        Efficacy and safety of remimazolam in endoscopic sedation—a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Front Med (Lausanne). 2021; 8655042
        • Lee A
        • Shirley M.
        Remimazolam: a review in procedural sedation.
        Drugs. 2021; 81: 1193-1201
        • Liu X
        • Ding B
        • Shi F
        • et al.
        The efficacy and safety of remimazolam tosilate versus etomidate-propofol in elderly outpatients undergoing colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized, single-blind, non-inferiority trial.
        Drug Des Devel Ther. 2021; 15: 4675-4685
        • Zhou Y
        • Hu P
        • Jiang J.
        Metabolite characterization of a novel sedative drug, remimazolam in human plasma and urine using ultra high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with synapt high-definition mass spectrometry.
        J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2017; 137: 78-83
        • Dinis-Oliveira RJ.
        Metabolic profiles of propofol and fospropofol: clinical and forensic interpretative aspects.
        Biomed Res Int. 2018; 20186852857