If you don't remember your password, you can reset it by entering your email address and clicking the Reset Password button. You will then receive an email that contains a secure link for resetting your password
If the address matches a valid account an email will be sent to __email__ with instructions for resetting your password
Address correspondence to: Sajid Iqbal, Imperial College London Diabetes Centre, Al Khaleej Al Arabi Street, PO Box 48338, Beside Zayed Military Hospital, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Evolocumab, a monoclonal inhibitor of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9, has been shown to reduce proatherogenic lipoproteins in patients with or without familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), diabetes mellitus, or atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). We explored the safety profile and clinical effectiveness of evolocumab in an outpatient population of Emirati individuals with FH diagnosed per Dutch Lipid Clinic Network criteria, previous ASCVD, or statin intolerance.
Methods
This study was a retrospective review of patients initiating evolocumab treatment for any indication at Imperial College London Diabetes Centre between 2017 and 2020. All individuals followed up for at least 90 days or with at least one lipid panel postinitiation were included. Participants were subclassified into primary prevention (no previous ASCVD event, n = 81) and secondary prevention (any prior clinical ASCVD event, n = 102) groups.
Findings
Evolocumab was initiated in 183 individuals (mean [SD] age, 51.5 [12.4] years; 51% male); 108 (59%) had a clinical or genetic FH diagnosis, and 70.5% had diabetes mellitus. Statin intolerance was a treatment indication in 60 (32.8%) individuals. At 90 days, substantial reductions in serum LDL-C, triglycerides (TG), and total cholesterol:HDL-C (TC:HDL-C) were observed in both the primary and secondary prevention groups, and both FH and non-FH individuals. In the primary prevention group, median (interquartile range) reduction in LDL-C was 43.7% (10.8%; 63.0%); TG, 15.0% (7.2%; 35.3%); and TC:HDL-C, 31.5% (11.1%; 46.0%). In the secondary prevention group, median (interquartile range) reduction in LDL-C was 48.3% (22%; 70%); TG, 19.6% (1.2%; 32.5%); and TC:HDL-C, 32.6% (14.6%; 46.3%) (all, P < 0.0001). American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association LDL-C targets were consistently achieved in 114 (62.3%) patients during a follow-up of 359 (79-639) days. Nonattainment of the LDL-C target was attributed to nonadherence in 36 (52.2%) patients and discontinuation of treatment in 14 (20.3%) patients. Evolocumab was discontinued in 4 patients because of adverse events.
Implications
This study is the first from the Middle East and North Africa region that reports the real-world efficacy of evolocumab in a mixed risk population of individuals with FH and other non-FH indications. Clinically meaningful and sustained reductions in LDL-C, TG, and cholesterol ratios were observed after evolocumab initiation. Few adverse events were reported in this predominantly Arabic population, consistent with previous safety reports for evolocumab. Notable strengths of this study include a relatively large cohort, patient heterogeneity and high retention, and a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Despite these strengths, the study has some limitations, including the selection bias due to the retrospective design and absence of comparative group.
LDL-C is a causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Recent evidence supports intensive LDL-C reduction in patients with ASCVD, but many individuals do not achieve their target LDL-C despite maximal conventional lipid-lowering therapy (LLT).
This has been attributed to factors such as pharmacogenetic effects on statin response, very high baseline LDL-C concentrations as seen in familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), and lack of adherence to therapies.
European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society Task Force consensus statement on proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors: practical guidance for use in patients at very high cardiovascular risk.
European Heart Journal [Internet].2016 Oct 27; 38 ([cited 2021 Feb 10]): ehw480
The proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor family is approved for use in patients with established ASCVD who require intensification of lipid reduction to meet American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA)
2019 ACC/AHA guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.
2019 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. The Task Force for the management of dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS).
European Heart Journal [Internet].2020 Jan 1; 41 ([cited 2021 Nov 17]): 111-188
treatment targets for secondary prevention, as well as for the primary prevention of ASCVD in people with inherited hypercholesterolemia (homozygous and heterozygous) and in patients unable to tolerate a statin.
In clinical trials, the PCSK9 inhibitor evolocumab as monotherapy reduced LDL-C levels up to 60% in patients with and without FH, diabetes mellitus, and/or ASCVD and was well tolerated.
European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society Task Force consensus statement on proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors: practical guidance for use in patients at very high cardiovascular risk.
European Heart Journal [Internet].2016 Oct 27; 38 ([cited 2021 Feb 10]): ehw480
2019 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. The Task Force for the management of dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS).
European Heart Journal [Internet].2020 Jan 1; 41 ([cited 2021 Nov 17]): 111-188
The FOURIER (Further Cardiovascular Outcomes Research With PCSK9i [Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin‐Kexin Type 9 Inhibitors] in Subjects With Elevated Risk) trials reported reductions in ASCVD events of 15%, with no significant differences in adverse events (AEs) among treatment groups.
However, there is little evidence in the literature regarding real-world clinical use of PCSK9 inhibitors, particularly in Arab populations and the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. The present study explored the safety profile and clinical effectiveness of evolocumab in a predominantly Emirati outpatient population.
Participants and Methods
Participants and Study Design
This study followed an observational retrospective cohort design and was conducted at the Imperial College London Diabetes Centre (ICLDC), Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. ICLDC is an outpatient facility that operates specialist Diabetology, Endocrinology, Cardiology, Nephrology, Ophthalmology, Internal Medicine, and General Practice clinics. Individuals enrolling for treatment at ICLDC are given the option to consent for the use of their anonymized data in clinical research. Anonymized patient data were retrieved from the ICLDC electronic medical record (EMR) covering the time period between January 2017 and October 2020. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Research Ethics Committee (IREC054). The study included all patients aged between 18 and 85 years who initiated PCSK9 inhibitor treatment at ICLDC and who attended follow-up with repetition of the lipid panel on at least one subsequent occasion. The time frame to each follow-up visit postinitiation of evolocumab was ≤3 months. Median follow-up was 359 (79-639) days. Evolocumab was administered at the licensed doses of 140 mg once every 2 weeks or 420 mg once monthly. The patients’ demographic characteristics, anthropometric measures, FH status, diabetes status and type of diabetes, AEs, and cardiovascular disease diagnoses (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision [ICD-10] codes: I21–I21.19, I25–125.83, I73.9, Z86.73, and Z95.1) were recorded.
Information on LLTs used to treat each individual before evolocumab initiation was retrieved from the EMR. Overall, 97% of participants were prescribed a statin before evolocumab initiation, 89% used ezetimibe, and 23% were prescribed omega-3 products. The lipid profile before initiation of evolocumab was considered as baseline. Preexisting or first visit ASCVD and/or cardiovascular events were reported as ASCVD prevalence, and subsequent ASCVD and/or cardiovascular events were reported as incidence. The cohort was subdivided into primary and secondary prevention groups based on the absence or presence of clinical ASCVD events at initiation of evolocumab, as per the ACC/AHA guidelines (2018–2019).
2019 ACC/AHA guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.
Clinical ASCVD includes acute coronary syndrome, those with a history of myocardial infarction, stable or unstable angina or coronary or other arterial revascularization, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or peripheral artery disease, including aortic aneurysm, all of atherosclerotic origin. All patients with no previous clinical ASCVD event/history were grouped into primary prevention and all patients with clinical ASCVD event/history prior to initiation of evolocumab were grouped into secondary prevention. For patients in the primary prevention group, 10-year ASCVD risk scores were computed before initiation of evolocumab by using pooled cohort equations.
Kane SP. ASCVD risk calculator: 10-year risk of first cardiovascular event using pooled cohort equations-ClinCalc.com [Internet]. [cited 2021 Mar 21]. Available from: https://clincalc.com/Cardiology/ASCVD/PooledCohort.aspx
In those without a previous ASCVD or FH diagnosis, individuals with absolute 10-year ASCVD risk scores of <5%, 5% to 7.5%, 7.5% to 20%, and >20% were classified as low, borderline, intermediate, and high risk, respectively.
2019 ACC/AHA guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.
2019 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. The Task Force for the management of dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS).
European Heart Journal [Internet].2020 Jan 1; 41 ([cited 2021 Nov 17]): 111-188
Risk prediction tools in cardiovascular disease prevention: A report from the ESC Prevention of CVD Programme led by the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC) in collaboration with the Acute Cardiovascular Care Association (ACCA) and the Association of Cardiovascular Nursing and Allied Professions (ACNAP).
(scores ≥5% to <10% and ≥10% categorizing patients as high risk and very high risk, respectively). Untreated LDL-C was estimated by dividing the on-treatment LDL-C values by the reciprocal of the expected percentage per the algorithm proposed by Ruel et al
to control for the effect of concomitant statin therapy. The estimated likelihood of an underlying diagnosis of FH was calculated by using the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network score (DLCNS) criteria.
FH status was considered definitive in individuals with a DLCNS score ≥8 or a genetic diagnosis.
Study Outcome Measures
The primary outcome was defined as attainment of ACC/AHA guidelines–recommended LDL-C targets of ≥30% reduction or LDL-C <2.6 mmol/L in primary prevention or ≥50% reduction or LDL-C <1.8 mmol/L in secondary prevention.
2019 ACC/AHA guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.
2019 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. The Task Force for the management of dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS).
European Heart Journal [Internet].2020 Jan 1; 41 ([cited 2021 Nov 17]): 111-188
The secondary outcome was incidence of new cardiovascular events after evolocumab initiation, expressed as a composite of myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, stroke, and unstable angina. Safety was assessed according to AEs (injection site reaction, myalgia, worsening of liver enzyme, nausea, and vomiting) recorded in the EMR. Adherence to treatment was assessed by manual review of clinician entries in the EMR and pharmacy records.
The standard of care at ICLDC for follow-up of patients with hyperlipidemia is to perform clinical review and relevant laboratory investigations every 3 months. Prescribing and dispensing of medication in the United Arab Emirates follows a 3-month schedule, and hence individuals who did not collect their prescribed medication during one 3-month cycle were considered to have lapsed treatment. The median follow-up period of the study individuals was 359 (79-639) days; except where indicated, this was the full duration since initiation of therapy at the time of data collection.
Statistical Analysis
Data are expressed as mean (SD) where normally distributed or as median (interquartile range [IQR]) if not. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to assess change in lipid parameters (LDL-C, TG, and total cholesterol [TC]:HDL-C ratio) following initiation of evolocumab. Where applicable, this test was also performed to assess the significance of differences among baseline and/or postbaseline characteristics in primary and secondary prevention groups. Cox proportional hazards model and Kaplan-Meier curve analysis were performed to measure the hazard ratio and its significance for the secondary outcome measures of the study. Where data were missing, mean values were imputed, amounting to <2% of the data. Statistical analysis was performed by using R version 4.0.3 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) with the survival, survminer, coin, psych, and tidyverse packages. Significance was assessed at P < 0.05 and at 95% of CI. No correction for multiple comparisons was performed.
Results
Patient Characteristics at Initiation of Evolocumab
A total of 183 individuals met inclusion criteria, of whom 81 (44.3%) received evolocumab on a primary prevention setting and 102 (55.7%) were treated for secondary prevention. Follow-up loss occurred in only 1 patient. Table I presents baseline clinical and laboratory characteristics of the participants. Overall, age at initiation of evolocumab was 51.5 (12.4) years, and 94 (51.4%) participants were male. In 179 cases (97.8%), evolocumab was administered as 140 mg every 2 weeks; in 4 cases (2.2%), the dose was 420 mg once a month. The most frequently recorded indication for evolocumab use was statin intolerance, noted in 60 individuals (32.8%).
Table IClinical and laboratory characteristics of patients with hyperlipidemia at initiation of evolocumab therapy according to the presence or absence of previous atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Values are presented as number (percentage), mean (SD) or median (interquartile range) unless otherwise indicated.
At initiation of evolocumab, 6 patients (3.3%) had a history of myocardial infarction (ICD-10 codes: I21, I21.3, I21.4, I21.19, and I25.2), 49 (26.8%) had coronary artery disease (ICD-10 codes: I25.10 and 125.83), 20 (10.9%) had chronic ischemic heart disease (ICD-10 code: I25), and 13 (7.1%) had aortocoronary bypass graft (ICD-10 code: Z95.1). Seven (3.8%) patients reported preexisting peripheral vascular disease (ICD-10 code: I73.9), and two (1.1%) reported previous transient ischemic attack (ICD-10 code: Z86.73).
A total of 108 individuals were diagnosed with definite FH according to DLCN criteria. Details are given in Table II. Genetic confirmation of FH was established in 6 patients (primary prevention, 2 with homozygous FH and 1 with heterozygous FH; secondary prevention, 3 with heterozygous FH). LDL-C values before and after initiation of evolocumab in patients with FH are presented in Supplemental Table 1 (see the online version at doi:10.1016/j.clinthera.2022.08.005).
Table IIDiagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) based on Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN) criteria.
A total of 121 (66.1%) patients achieved their individualized LDL-C target determined by following the ACC/AHA guidelines (ie, ≥30% reduction or LDL-C <2.6 mmol/L in primary prevention or ≥50% reduction or LDL-C <1.8 mmol/L in secondary prevention) within 90 days of evolocumab initiation; of these, 114 (94.2%) sustained these results at each subsequent visit over an average follow-up period of 359 (280) days. Changes in LDL-C after initiation of evolocumab over a follow-up period ≥366 days are shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1Reduction in LDL-C postinitiation of evolocumab. Values are presented as numbers, and median (IQR). Primary prevention group target ≥30% reduction or LDL-C <2.6 mmol/L; secondary prevention group target ≥50% reduction or LDL-C <1.8 mmol/L. n = number of patients at each time point. ACC/AHA = American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association; PCSK9-i = proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9- inhibitor.
Figure 2 shows patient study flow according to sustained or nonsustained LDL-C reduction during follow-up. Sixty-nine (37.7%) individuals did not attain target LDL-C at more than one review. Nonattainment of the LDL-C target at follow-up was attributed to nonadherence in 36 (52.2%), discontinuation of treatment in 14 (20.3%), and interruption of funding or drug supply limitations in 11 (15.9%). Fourteen patients discontinued treatment, 4 due to AEs, 4 prior to surgical procedures, 2 due to pregnancy, and 4 due to concerns regarding potential side effects (eg, nausea, vomiting, injection site reaction).
Figure 2Flow diagram of study individuals treated with evolocumab according to sustained or not LDL-C reductions. Values are presented as numbers. AE = adverse events.
Analysis of Individuals Achieving LDL-C Values <1.4 mmol/L
The target LDL-C <1.4 mmol/L was set by the ESC/EAS guidelines in 93 individuals at the initiation of evolocumab. Of the total, 38 (40.9%) individuals achieved LDL-C <1.4 mmol/L at ≤90 days of initiation of evolocumab; 23 (60.5%) of these individuals sustained these results at each subsequent follow-up visit over an average follow-up period of 304 (280) days. Figure 3 displays the achievement of LDL-C values <1.4 mmol/L in patients with definite FH. Overall, 15.9% (7 of 44) achieved LDL-C values <1.4 mmol/L after 365 days of therapy.
Figure 3Individuals with definite familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) achieving LDL-C target <1.4 mmol/L. Values are presented as numbers. ESC/EAS = European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society.
In the primary prevention group (n = 81), 26 (32.1%) and 9 (11.1%) individuals were classified as at intermediate and high risk of ASCVD, respectively. In the secondary prevention group (n = 102), 92 (90.2%) were considered as very high risk and 10 (9.8%) as high risk according to the ESC Smart SCORE. Six (7.4%) of 81 individuals in the primary prevention group and 35 (34.3%) of 102 individuals in the secondary prevention group were diagnosed with a new cardiovascular event following initiation of evolocumab. The hazard of new ASCVD event corrected for age, sex, smoking status, diabetes status, and FH status was 6 times higher in the secondary prevention group than in the primary prevention group (hazard ratio, 5.8; 95% CI, 2.3-14.4; P < 0.0001). Moreover, the estimated hazard adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, diabetes status, and FH status for individuals who achieved their ACC/AHA/ESC/EAS LDL-C targets (LDL-C target achievers) versus those who did not achieve these targets (LDL-C target nonachievers) was 0.46 (95% CI, 0.24-0.89; P <0.02). Figure 4 presents the hazard function among LDL-C target achievers versus nonachievers.
Figure 4Kaplan-Meier curve analysis and Cox regression in LDL-C target achievers and nonachievers. Values are presented as number (%) or probability (%). ASCVD = atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; HR = hazard ratio.
The LDL-C levels were examined on a median of 6 (1-26) occasions during follow-up. Median (IQR) LDL-C, TG, HDL-C, and TC:HDL-C ratio in primary prevention patients at the initiation of PCSK9-i (evolocumab) were 4.4 (3.7-5.2) mmol/L, 1.9 (1.2-2.6) mmol/L, 1.2 (1.1-1.4) mmol/L, and 4.8 (3.6-6.0) mmol/L, respectively. In secondary prevention, the median (IQR) of LDL-C, TG, HDL, and TC:HDL-C ratio at the initiation of evolocumab were 3.6 (2.7-5.0) mmol/L, 1.9 (1.4-2.9) mmol/L, 1.2 (1.0-1.4) mmol/L, and 4.4 (3.5-5.5) mmol/L, respectively.
Overall, robust median (IQR) percent reductions in serum LDL-C of 46% (17.4%; 66.2%), TG of 17.8% (5.2%; 39.5%), and TC:HDL-C ratio of 32.1% (14.1%; 46.3%) (all, P < 0.0001) occurred in the first 90 days’ postinitiation of evolocumab along with an increase in HDL-C (2.2% [–4.7%; 11.6%]; P < 0.005). In the primary prevention group, LDL-C was reduced by 43.7% (10.8%; 63.0%), TG by 15% (35.3%; 7.2%), and the TC:HDL ratio by 31.5% (11.1%; 46.0%) (all, P < 0.0001). In the secondary prevention group, the reductions in LDL-C were 48.3% (22%; 70%); TG, 19.6% (1.2%; 32.5%); and TC/HDL-C ratio, 32.6% (14.6%; 46.3%) (all, P < 0.0001). The median increase in HDL-C was 5.8% (–4.6%; 11.9% [P < 0.0001]) in the primary prevention group and 2% (–5.4%; 11.3% [P < 0.05]) in the secondary prevention group. Changes in LDL-C after initiation of evolocumab in the primary and secondary prevention groups are illustrated in Figure 5.
Figure 5LDL-C before and after initiation of evolocumab (at >366 days) in individuals with previous or not atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease diagnosis. Follow-up period = >366 days. Primary prevention group, n = 31; secondary prevention group, n = 57.
A robust path for LLT combinations was used before the clinical decision to initiate evolocumab; 70.4% (n = 57) of patients in the primary prevention group and 81.4% (n = 83) in the secondary prevention group received at least one statin therapy since the diagnosis of hyperlipidemia. Median duration of statin usage for patients treated with a statin before evolocumab initiation was 600 (267; 903) days in the primary prevention group and 568 (331; 836) days in the secondary prevention group. The chief reason for previous LLT discontinuation at initiation of evolocumab was statin intolerance in 33 (40.7%) patients in the primary prevention group and in 27 (26.5%) patients in the secondary prevention group (P < 0.04). Discontinuation of statin and background therapy would also account for nonachievement of LDL-C targets. Statin-induced AEs were recorded in 25 (24.5%) patients in secondary prevention and 12 (14.8%) in primary prevention (P < 0.001).
Safety
Four (2.2%) patients presented with AEs attributed to evolocumab, including injection site reaction in two (1.1%), one (0.6%) with myalgia, and one (0.6%) with elevation of liver enzymes. Table III provides a summary of the treatment-emergent AEs.
Table IIISummary of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) for evolocumab.
In our experience, countries in the MENA region rely on data from North American and European authorities for new drug approvals, and data regarding the safety and effectiveness of new therapies in Arabic populations are lacking. To our knowledge, the present study is the first real-world study describing experience with evolocumab in the MENA region in a large cohort of patients who were followed up for at least 1 year. Overall, evolocumab was well tolerated and provided robust and sustained reductions in proatherogenic lipids.
Real-world experience reports, including the ones of Nanchen et al,
described evolocumab use in statin intolerance (10%–12%) and in patients with FH. Furthermore, indications for use were high ASCVD risk and heterozygous FH reported by Villa et al
Toth PP, Danese M, Villa G, Qian Y, Beaubrun A, Lira A, et al. Estimated burden of cardiovascular disease and value-based price range for evolocumab in a high-risk, secondary-prevention population in the US payer context. https://doi.org/101080/1369699820171284078 [Internet]. 2017 Jun 3 [cited 2021 Sep 13];20(6):555–64.
respectively. In our cohort, FH, very high ASCVD risk, and statin intolerance were the leading indications for the use of evolocumab. Evolocumab was effective in lowering LDL-C levels to within individualized target ranges in the majority of participants, particularly in those with statin intolerance.
Although significant LDL-C reductions were noted after evolocumab prescription in both the primary and secondary prevention groups, these reductions were more pronounced in the secondary prevention group. The most likely explanation is the higher number of FH patients in the primary prevention cohort who usually have higher baseline LDL-C levels. The high number of FH individuals with elevated LDL-C levels is difficult to treat, in case the induction of PCSK9 inhibitor with other LLT may benefit.
Krähenbühl S, Pavik-Mezzour I, von Eckardstein A. Unmet needs in LDL-C lowering: when statins won't do! Drugs 2016 76:12 [Internet]. 2016 Jul 25 [cited 2021 Sep 13];76(12):1175–90. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40265-016-0613-0
Other potential factors include a higher proportion of female patients, younger age, and higher baseline HDL-C and TG levels in the primary prevention group, which have been reported to independently affect the likelihood of achieving LDL-C targets.
2019 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. The Task Force for the management of dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS).
European Heart Journal [Internet].2020 Jan 1; 41 ([cited 2021 Nov 17]): 111-188
Cardiovascular safety and efficacy of the PCSK9 inhibitor evolocumab in patients with and without diabetes and the effect of evolocumab on glycaemia and risk of new-onset diabetes: a prespecified analysis of the FOURIER randomised controlled trial.
The Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology.2017 Dec 1; 5: 941-950
Long-term low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-lowering efficacy, persistence, and safety of evolocumab in treatment of hypercholesterolemia: results up to 4 years from the open-label OSLER-1 extension study.
which is comparable to our findings. LDL-C reductions of 39%, 52.3%, 54.9%, and 60% were observed in PCSK9 treatment groups in reports by Sarsam et al,
In the present study, introduction pf evolocumab helped attain the ACC/AHA guidelines- recommended reduction in LDL-C (≥30% reduction or LDL-C <2.6 mmol/L in primary prevention or ≥50% reduction or LDL-C <1.8 mmol/L in secondary prevention) not only as add-on therapy to statins but also as a combination with other LLTs in statin-intolerant patients. Voutyritsa et al
reported that the addition of evolocumab to other LLTs lowered LDL-C levels by ∼60%.
The secondary outcome measure of the present study was the incidence of ASCVD and/or cardiac events postinitiation of evolocumab. The incidence of new ASCVD events in patients at a minimum follow-up of 366 days was 8.6% and 29.4%, respectively, in the primary and secondary prevention groups. These findings clearly highlight the elevated ASCVD risk and great unmet need of the studied population. How much the use of evolocumab in our population has had an impact on the risk of these events remains to be determined. Previously, Dixon et al
reported a 9.8% reduction in the incidence of ASCVD events after initiation of evolocumab in patients at high risk of ASCVD already treated with statins. In contrast, among the secondary prevention patients, only the FOURIER trial reported a 15% reduction in ASCVD incidence (hazard ratios of 0.83 and 0.87 in patients with diabetes and without diabetes, respectively).
Cardiovascular safety and efficacy of the PCSK9 inhibitor evolocumab in patients with and without diabetes and the effect of evolocumab on glycaemia and risk of new-onset diabetes: a prespecified analysis of the FOURIER randomised controlled trial.
The Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology.2017 Dec 1; 5: 941-950
Due to the lack of a comparison group in our study, we are unable to comment on relative risk reduction in ASCVD incidence.
Evolocumab was well tolerated, with few documented AEs in our patients. Similar good tolerability has also been shown in the GAUSS-3 (Goal Achievement After Utilizing an Anti-PCSK9 Antibody in Statin Intolerant Subjects-3) randomized clinical trial,
which reported a significant reduction in LDL-C levels with evolocumab and also fewer AEs compared with other LLTs. Based on our findings, we suggest that evolocumab is a well-tolerated, safe drug for the treatment of hyperlipidemia in patients with or without cardiac comorbidities.
noted that drug discontinuation was responsible for a nonsustained LDL-C reduction in 7% of participants. We observed comparable rates of evolocumab discontinuation but a smaller proportion was attributed to AEs (2.2%). In contrast, the OSLER-1 (Open Label Study of Long Term Evaluation Against LDL-C Trial) extension study
Long-term low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-lowering efficacy, persistence, and safety of evolocumab in treatment of hypercholesterolemia: results up to 4 years from the open-label OSLER-1 extension study.
reported discontinuation of evolocumab in 21% of participants.
The current study is the first from the MENA region that reports the real-world efficacy of evolocumab in a mixed risk population of individuals with FH and other non-FH indications. Notable strengths of our study include a relatively large cohort, patient heterogeneity and high retention, and a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Despite these strengths, our study has some limitations, including the selection bias due to the retrospective design and absence of comparative group.
Conclusions
Clinically meaningful and sustained reductions in LDL-C, TG, and cholesterol ratios were observed after introduction of evolocumab, and the drug was well tolerated. This supports the role of evolocumab in the management of hyperlipidemia and ASCVD in a predominantly Arabic population.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the ICLDC, and there was no specific funding required. Moreover, this research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
The authors acknowledge Miss Shatha Alaydaroos and Dr. Tanveer Ashraf's contributions in facilitating the data extraction for this study.
Author contributions to the article are as follows: study conception and design, Mr. Iqbal, Dr. Siddiqui, and Dr Buckley; data collection, Miss Al Tikriti and Mr. Iqbal; analysis and interpretation of results, Mr. Iqbal and Drs. Buckley, Sabbour, and Santos; draft manuscript preparation, Mr. Iqbal and Drs Siddiqui, Buckley, Sabbour, and Santos; and critical review of the manuscript, Drs Santos, Buckley, and Sabbour. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Declaration of Interest
Dr. Santos has received honoraria related to consulting, research, and or speaker activities from: Abbott, Amgen, Aché, AstraZeneca, Esperion, EMS, GETZ Pharma, Kowa, Libbs, Merck, MSD, Novo Nordisk, Novartis, PTC Therapeutics, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi. Dr. Sabbour has received honoraria related to speaker activities from: Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Libbs, Merck, MSD, Novo Nordisk, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi. The authors have indicated that they have no other conflicts of interest regarding the content of this article.
European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society Task Force consensus statement on proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors: practical guidance for use in patients at very high cardiovascular risk.
European Heart Journal [Internet].2016 Oct 27; 38 ([cited 2021 Feb 10]): ehw480
2019 ACC/AHA guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.
2019 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. The Task Force for the management of dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS).
European Heart Journal [Internet].2020 Jan 1; 41 ([cited 2021 Nov 17]): 111-188
Kane SP. ASCVD risk calculator: 10-year risk of first cardiovascular event using pooled cohort equations-ClinCalc.com [Internet]. [cited 2021 Mar 21]. Available from: https://clincalc.com/Cardiology/ASCVD/PooledCohort.aspx
Risk prediction tools in cardiovascular disease prevention: A report from the ESC Prevention of CVD Programme led by the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC) in collaboration with the Acute Cardiovascular Care Association (ACCA) and the Association of Cardiovascular Nursing and Allied Professions (ACNAP).
Toth PP, Danese M, Villa G, Qian Y, Beaubrun A, Lira A, et al. Estimated burden of cardiovascular disease and value-based price range for evolocumab in a high-risk, secondary-prevention population in the US payer context. https://doi.org/101080/1369699820171284078 [Internet]. 2017 Jun 3 [cited 2021 Sep 13];20(6):555–64.
Krähenbühl S, Pavik-Mezzour I, von Eckardstein A. Unmet needs in LDL-C lowering: when statins won't do! Drugs 2016 76:12 [Internet]. 2016 Jul 25 [cited 2021 Sep 13];76(12):1175–90. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40265-016-0613-0
Cardiovascular safety and efficacy of the PCSK9 inhibitor evolocumab in patients with and without diabetes and the effect of evolocumab on glycaemia and risk of new-onset diabetes: a prespecified analysis of the FOURIER randomised controlled trial.
The Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology.2017 Dec 1; 5: 941-950
Long-term low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-lowering efficacy, persistence, and safety of evolocumab in treatment of hypercholesterolemia: results up to 4 years from the open-label OSLER-1 extension study.
The difference is statistically significant (P < 0.05; 95% CI).
00285-5&id=gr1.jpg){kind=link}
00285-5&id=gr2.jpg){kind=link}
00285-5&id=gr3.jpg){kind=link}
00285-5&id=gr4.jpg){kind=link}
00285-5&id=gr5.jpg){kind=link}