Advertisement
Review Article| Volume 41, ISSUE 3, P552-581, March 2019

Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems and Antibiotic Prescribing: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

  • Eduardo Carracedo-Martinez
    Correspondence
    Address correspondence to: Eduardo Carracedo Martinez, Aparta de Correos 466, 15786, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain.
    Affiliations
    Santiago de Compostela Health Area, Galician Health Service (Servizo Galego de Saúde-SERGAS), Spanish National Health System, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
    Search for articles by this author
  • Christian Gonzalez-Gonzalez
    Affiliations
    Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
    Search for articles by this author
  • Antonio Teixeira-Rodrigues
    Affiliations
    Department of Medical Sciences and Institute for Biomedicine (iBiMED), University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal
    Search for articles by this author
  • Jesus Prego-Dominguez
    Affiliations
    Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
    Search for articles by this author
  • Bahi Takkouche
    Affiliations
    Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain

    Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública-CIBERESP), Santiago de Compostela, Spain
    Search for articles by this author
  • Maria Teresa Herdeiro
    Affiliations
    Department of Medical Sciences and Institute for Biomedicine (iBiMED), University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal
    Search for articles by this author
  • Adolfo Figueiras
    Affiliations
    Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain

    Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública-CIBERESP), Santiago de Compostela, Spain

    Institute of Health Research of Santiago de Compsotela (IDIS), Spain
    Search for articles by this author
  • on behalf ofthe Galician Pharmacoepidemiology Research Group
    Author Footnotes
    † Members of the Galician Pharmacoepidemiology Research Study Group are listed in the Acknowledgments.
  • Author Footnotes
    † Members of the Galician Pharmacoepidemiology Research Study Group are listed in the Acknowledgments.

      Abstract

      Purpose

      The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies performed in primary care centers and hospital facilities that evaluated the effectiveness of computerized clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) in decision making on the prescription of any given antibiotic.

      Methods

      We conducted a search of the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. A meta-analysis was then conducted of all variables with results reported in >2 studies.

      Findings

      A total of 42 of the 46 studies included in the review identified a statistically significant advantage for CDSSs in ≥1 study variables. The effect of CDSSs on the percentage accuracy of the antibiotic spectrum prescribed empirically with respect to the microbial agent's susceptibility, which is one of the most frequently studied outcome variables, was examined in 7 studies, all undertaken in hospital settings. In all these studies but one, CDSSs resulted in a statistically significant increase in percentage accuracy. The other study variables present in >2 studies had more inconsistent results. Although the results of the meta-analysis of the variables percentage accuracy, antibiotic prescription rate in hospital, percentage adherence to antibiotic prescription guidelines in primary care or hospital, and percentage of inappropriate prescriptions for antibiotics in primary care were statistically significantly favorable to CDSSs; in the case of hospital length of stay and mortality, they were favorable although not statistically significantly.

      Implications

      CDSSs appear to be useful for variables such as the percentage of appropriate empirical treatment in the hospital setting or to induce changes in antibiotics prescription rate. Even so, more better quality studies are required to draw clearer conclusions in respect of morbidity and mortality outcome variables and other settings.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Therapeutics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Malo S.
        • Bjerrum L.
        • Feja C.
        • et al.
        Compliance with recommendations on outpatient Antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract infections: the case of Spain.
        Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2015; 116: 337-342
        • European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control
        Surveillance of Antimicrobial Consumption in Europe 2012.
        ECDC, Stockholm2014
        • Butler C.C.
        • Hood K.
        • Verheij T.
        • et al.
        Variation in antibiotic prescribing and its impact on recovery in patients with acute cough in primary care: prospective study in 13 countries.
        BMJ. 2009; 338: b2242
        • van der Velden L.B.J.
        • Tromp M.
        • Bleeker-Rovers C.P.
        • et al.
        Non-adherence to antimicrobial treatment guidelines results in more broad-spectrum but not more appropriate therapy.
        Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012; 31: 1561-1568
        • Garg A.X.
        • Adhikari N.K.
        • McDonald H.
        • et al.
        Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review.
        JAMA. 2005; 293: 1223-1238
        • Liberati A.
        • Altman D.G.
        • Tetzlaff J.
        • Mulrow C.
        • Gøtzsche P.C.
        • et al.
        The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.
        PLoS Med. 2009; 6: e1000100https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100
        • Pearson S.A.
        • Moxey A.
        • Robertson J.
        • et al.
        Do computerised clinical decision support systems for prescribing change practice? A systematic review of the literature (1990-2007).
        BMC Health Serv Res. 2009; 9: 154
        • Faraone S.V.
        Interpreting estimates of treatment effects: implications for managed care.
        P T. 2008; 33: 700-711
        • Egger M.
        • Davey Smith G.
        • Schneider M.
        • Minder C.
        Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test.
        BMJ. 1997; 315: 629-634
        • Leibovici L.
        • Gitelman V.
        • Yehezkelli Y.
        • et al.
        Improving empirical antibiotic treatment: prospective, nonintervention testing of a decision support system.
        J Intern Med. 1997; 242: 395-400
        • Shojania K.G.
        • Yokoe D.
        • Platt R.
        • Fiskio J.
        • Ma'luf N.
        • Bates D.W.
        Reducing vancomycin use utilizing a computer guideline: results of a randomized controlled trial.
        J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1998; 5: 554-562
        • Christakis D.A.
        • Zimmerman F.J.
        • Wright J.A.
        • Garrison M.M.
        • Rivara F.P.
        • Davis R.L.
        A randomized controlled trial of point-of-care evidence to improve the antibiotic prescribing practices for otitis media in children.
        Pediatrics. 2001; 107: E15
        • Mullett C.J.
        • Evans R.S.
        • Christenson J.C.
        • Dean J.M.
        Development and impact of a computerized pediatric antiinfective decision support program.
        Pediatrics. 2001; 108: E75
        • Mullett C.J.
        • Thomas J.G.
        • Smith C.L.
        • Sarwari A.R.
        • Khakoo R.A.
        Computerized antimicrobial decision support: an offline evaluation of a database-driven empiric antimicrobial guidance program in hospitalized patients with a bloodstream infection.
        Int J Med Inform. 2004; 73: 455-460
        • Samore M.H.
        • Bateman K.
        • Alder S.C.
        • et al.
        Clinical decision support and appropriateness of antimicrobial prescribing: a randomized trial.
        JAMA. 2005; 294: 2305-2314
        • Sintchenko V.
        • Iredell J.R.
        • Gilbert G.L.
        • Coiera E.
        Handheld computer-based decision support reduces patient length of stay and antibiotic prescribing in critical care.
        J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005; 12: 398-402
        • Paul M.
        • Andreassen S.
        • Tacconelli E.
        • et al.
        Improving empirical antibiotic treatment using TREAT, a computerized decision support system: cluster randomized trial.
        J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006; 58: 1238-1245
        • McGregor J.C.
        • Weekes E.
        • Forrest G.N.
        • et al.
        Impact of a computerized clinical decision support system on reducing inappropriate antimicrobial use: a randomized controlled trial.
        J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006; 13: 378-384
        • Thursky K.A.
        • Buising K.L.
        • Bak N.
        • et al.
        Reduction of broad-spectrum antibiotic use with computerized decision support in an intensive care unit.
        Int J Qual Health Care. 2006; 18: 224-231
        • Davis R.L.
        • Wright J.
        • Chalmers F.
        • et al.
        A cluster randomized clinical trial to improve prescribing patterns in ambulatory pediatrics.
        PLoS Clin Trials. 2007; 2: e25
        • Buising K.L.
        • Thursky K.A.
        • Black J.F.
        • et al.
        Improving antibiotic prescribing for adults with community acquired pneumonia: does a computerised decision support system achieve more than academic detailing alone? A time series analysis.
        BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008; 8: 35https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-8-35
        • Kofoed K.
        • Zalounina A.
        • Andersen O.
        • et al.
        Performance of the TREAT decision support system in an environment with a low prevalence of resistant pathogens.
        J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009; 63: 400-404
        • Linder J.A.
        • Schnipper J.L.
        • Tsurikova R.
        • et al.
        Documentation-based clinical decision support to improve antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory infections in primary care: a cluster randomised controlled trial.
        Inform Prim Care. 2009; 17: 231-240
        • Bourgeois F.C.
        • Linder J.
        • Johnson S.A.
        • Co J.P.
        • Fiskio J.
        • Ferris T.G.
        Impact of a computerized template on antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory infections in children and adolescents.
        Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2010; 49: 976-983
        • Tafelski S.
        • Nachtigall I.
        • Deja M.
        • et al.
        Computer-assisted decision support for changing practice in severe sepsis and septic shock.
        J Int Med Res. 2010; 38: 1605-1616
        • Yong M.K.
        • Buising K.L.
        • Cheng A.C.
        • Thursky K.A.
        Improved susceptibility of gram-negative bacteria in an intensive care unit following implementation of a computerized antibiotic decision support system.
        J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010; 65: 1062-1069
        • Rattinger G.B.
        • Mullins C.D.
        • Zuckerman I.H.
        • et al.
        A sustainable strategy to prevent misuse of antibiotics for acute respiratory infections.
        PLoS One. 2012; 7: e51147https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051147
        • Mainous 3rd, A.G.
        • Lambourne C.A.
        • Nietert P.J.
        Impact of a clinical decision support system on antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory infections in primary care: quasi-experimental trial.
        J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013; 20: 317-324https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000701
        • Gonzales R.
        • Anderer T.
        • McCulloch C.E.
        • et al.
        A cluster randomized trial of decision support strategies for reducing antibiotic use in acute bronchitis.
        JAMA Intern Med. 2013; 173: 267-273https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.1589
        • Forrest C.B.
        • Fiks A.G.
        • Bailey L.C.
        • et al.
        Improving adherence to otitis media guidelines with clinical decision support and physician feedback.
        Pediatrics. 2013; 131: e1071-e1081https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2012-1988
        • Filice G.A.
        • Drekonja D.M.
        • Thurn J.R.
        • et al.
        Use of a computer decision support system and antimicrobial therapy appropriateness.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013; 34: 558-565https://doi.org/10.1086/670627
        • Leibovici L.
        • Kariv G.
        • Paul M.
        Long-term survival in patients included in a randomized controlled trial of TREAT, a decision support system for antibiotic treatment.
        J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013; 68: 2664-2666https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkt222
        • McGinn T.G.
        • McCullagh L.
        • Kannry J.
        • et al.
        Efficacy of an evidence-based clinical decision support in primary care practices: a randomized clinical trial.
        JAMA Intern Med. 2013; 173: 1584-1591https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.8980
        • Demonchy E.
        • Dufour J.C.
        • Gaudart J.
        • et al.
        Impact of a computerized decision support system on compliance with guidelines on antibiotics prescribed for urinary tract infections in emergency departments: a multicentre prospective before-and-after controlled interventional study.
        J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014; 69: 2857-2863https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dku191
        • Dumkow L.E.
        • Kenney R.M.
        • MacDonald N.C.
        • Carreno J.J.
        • Malhotra
        • Davis S.L.
        Impact of a multidisciplinary culture follow-up program of antimicrobial therapy in the emergency department.
        Infect Dis Ther. 2014; 3: 45-53https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-014-0026-x
        • Gulliford M.C.
        • van Staa T.
        • Dregan A.
        • et al.
        Electronic health records for intervention research: a cluster randomized trial to reduce antibiotic prescribing in primary care (eCRT study).
        Ann Fam Med. 2014; 12: 344-351https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1659
        • Nachtigall I.
        • Tafelski S.
        • Deja M.
        • et al.
        Long-term effect of computer-assisted decision support for antibiotic treatment in critically ill patients: a prospective 'before/after' cohort study.
        BMJ Open. 2014; 4: e005370https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005370
        • Hamad A.
        • Cavell G.
        • Hinton J.
        • Wade P.
        • Whittlesea C.
        A pre-postintervention study to evaluate the impact of dose calculators on the accuracy of gentamicin and vancomycin initial doses.
        BMJ Open. 2015; 5: e006610https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006610
        • Ng T.M.
        • Liew Y.X.
        • Teng C.B.
        • et al.
        An interactive, point-of-care, computerised antibiotic prescription decision support system and quality of antibiotic prescription in the management of complicated urinary tract infection.
        J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2014; 2: 127-128
        • Dean N.C.
        • Jones B.E.
        • Jones J.P.
        • et al.
        Impact of an electronic clinical decision support tool for emergency department patients with pneumonia.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2015; 66: 511-520
        • Hingorani R.
        • Mahmood M.
        • Alweis R.
        Improving antibiotic adherence in treatment of acute upper respiratory infections: a quality improvement process.
        J Commun Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2015; 5: 27472
        • Faine B.
        • Mohr N.
        • Harland K.K.
        • et al.
        Importance of decision support implementation in emergency department vancomycin dosing.
        West J Emerg Med. 2015; 16: 557-564
        • Beeler P.E.
        • Kuster S.P.
        • Eschmann E.
        • et al.
        Earlier switching from intravenous to oral antibiotics owing toelectronic reminders.
        Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2015; 46: 428-433
        • Shakib J.
        • Buchi K.
        • Smith E.
        • et al.
        Management of newborns born to mothers with chorioamnionitis: is it time for a kinder, gentler approach?.
        Acad Pediatr. 2015; 15: 340-344
        • Kandel C.E.
        • Gill S.
        • McCready J.
        • et al.
        Reducing co-administration of proton pump inhibitors and antibiotics using a computerized order entry alert and prospective audit and feedback.
        BMC Infect Dis. 2016; 16: 355
        • Kerste M.
        • Corver J.
        • Sonnevelt M.C.
        • et al.
        Application of sepsis calculator in newborns with suspected infection.
        J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016; 29: 3860-3865
        • Gifford J.
        • Vaeth E.
        • Richards K.
        • et al.
        Decision support during electronic prescription to stem antibiotic overuse for acute respiratory infections: a long-term, quasi-experimental study.
        BMC Infect Dis. 2017; 17: 528
        • Sharp A.L.
        • Hu Y.R.
        • Shen E.
        • et al.
        Improving antibiotic stewardship: a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial.
        Am J Manag Care. 2017; 23: e360-e365
        • Berrevoets M.A.
        • Pot J.L.W.
        • Houterman A.E.
        • et al.
        An electronic trigger tool to ptimize intravenous to oral antibiotic switch: a controlled, interrupted time series study.
        Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2017; 6: 81
        • Haque F.
        • Ball R.L.
        • Khatun S.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of a smartphone decision-support tool for diarrheal disease management in a resource-limited setting.
        PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017; 11: e0005290
        • Hincker A.
        • Abdallah A.B.
        • Avidan M.
        • et al.
        Electronic medical record interventions and recurrent perioperative antibiotic administration: a before-and-after study.
        Can J Anesth. 2017; 64: 716-723
        • Blumenthal K.G.
        • Wickner P.G.
        • Hurwitz S.
        • et al.
        Tackling inpatient penicillin allergies: assessing tools for antimicrobial stewardship.
        J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017; 140: 154-161
        • Money N.
        • Newman J.
        • Demissie S.
        • et al.
        Anti-microbial stewardship: antibiotic use in well-appearing term neonates born to mothers with chorioamnionitis.
        J Perinatol. 2017; 37: 1304-1309
        • Kuzniewicz M.W.
        • Puopolo K.M.
        • Fischer A.
        • et al.
        A quantitative, risk-based approach to the management of neonatal early-onset sepsis.
        JAMA Pediatr. 2017; 171: 365-371
        • Petersen I.
        • Johnson A.M.
        • Islam A.
        • et al.
        Protective effect of antibiotics against serious complications of common respiratory tract infections: retrospective cohort study with the UK General Practice Research Database.
        BMJ. 2007; 335: 982
        • Gonzalez-Gonzalez C.
        • López-Vázquez P.
        • Vázquez-Lago J.M.
        • et al.
        Effect of physicians' attitudes and knowledge on the quality of antibiotic prescription: a cohort study.
        PLoS One. 2015; 10: e0141820https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141820
        • Isaac T.
        • Weissman J.S.
        • Davis R.B.
        • et al.
        Overrides of medication alerts in ambulatory care.
        Arch Intern Med. 2009; 169: 305-311
        • Pfistermeister B.
        • Sedlmayr B.
        • Patapovas A.
        • et al.
        Development of a standardized rating tool for drug alerts to reduce information overload.
        Methods Inf Med. 2016; 55: 507-515
        • Bell B.G.
        • Schellevis F.
        • Stobberingh E.
        • Goossens H.
        • Pringle M.
        A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of antibiotic consumption on antibiotic resistance.
        BMC Infect Dis. 2014; 14: 13https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-13
        • David M.Z.
        • Cadilla A.
        • Boyle-Vavra S.
        • Daum R.S.
        Replacement of HA-MRSA by CA-MRSA infections at an academic medical center in the midwestern United States, 2004-5 to 2008.
        PLoS One. 2014; 9: e92760https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092760
        • Fleming-Dutra K.E.
        • Hersh A.L.
        • Shapiro D.J.
        • et al.
        Prevalence of inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions among US ambulatory care visits, 2010-2011.
        JAMA. 2016; 315: 1864-1873
        • Stearns C.R.
        • Gonzales R.
        • Camargo Jr., C.A.
        • Marselli J.
        • Metlay J.P.
        Antibiotic prescriptions are associated with increased patient satisfaction with emergency department visits for acute respiratory infections.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2009; 16: 934-941
        • Carracedo-Martínez E.
        Consequences of self-medication with prescription drugs.
        Aten Primaria. 2006; 38: 62
        • Morgan D.J.
        • Okeke I.N.
        • Laxminarayan R.
        • Perencevich E.N.
        • Weisenberg S.
        Non-prescription antimicrobial use worldwide: a systematic review.
        Lancet Infect Dis. 2011; 11: 692-701
        • Holstiege J.
        • Mathes T.
        • Pieper D.
        Effects of computer-aided clinical decision support systems in improving antibiotic prescribing by primary care providers: a systematic review.
        J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015; 22: 236-242
        • Shebl N.A.
        • Franklin B.D.
        • Barber N.
        Clinical decision support systems and antibiotic use.
        Pharm World Sci. 2007; 29: 342-349
        • Yousefi-Nooraie R.
        • Shakiba B.
        • Mortaz-Hejri S.
        Country development and manuscript selection bias: a review of published studies.
        BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006; 6: 37https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-6-37
        • Van Boeckel T.P.
        • Gandra S.
        • Ashok A.
        • et al.
        Global antibiotic consumption 2000 to 2010: an analysis of national pharmaceutical sales data.
        Lancet Infect Dis. 2014; 14: 742-750
        • Higgins J.P.T.
        Heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be expected and appropriately quantified.
        Int J Epidemiol. 2008; 37: 1158-1160
      1. EmarketerMobile Officially a Staple in the Doctor's Office. More than Eight in 10 Doctors Use Smartphones for Work, and 56% Use Tablets. http://www.emarketer.com/Article/Mobile-Officially-Staple-Doctors-Office/1012271.

        • Lewis T.
        • Synowiec C.
        • Lagomarsino G.
        • Schweitzer J.
        E-health in low-and middle-income countries: findings from the Center for Health Market Innovations.
        Bull World Health Organ. 2012; 90 ([Internet]): 332-340
        • Vázquez-Mourelle R.
        • Carracedo-Martínez E.
        The influence of changes in hospital drug formulary on the prescription of proton pump inhibitors.
        Farm Hosp. 2017; 41: 49-67