Abstract
Purpose
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has emerged as one of the most important nosocomial pathogens. Resistance to antibiotic therapy has been known to emerge especially in clinically complex scenarios, resulting in challenges in determining optimal treatment of serious MRSA. Daptomycin, in combination with other antibiotics, has been successfully used in the treatment of these infections, with the aims of resulting in reducing the prevention of antimicrobial resistance and increased killing compared with daptomycin monotherapy.
Methods
This article reviews all the published studies that used daptomycin combination therapy for the treatment of bacteremia and associated complicated infections caused by gram-positive organisms, including MRSA. We discuss the rationale of combination antibiotics and the mechanisms that enhance the activity of daptomycin, with special focus on the role of β-lactam antibiotics.
Findings
There are limited clinical data on the use of daptomycin in combination with other antibiotics. Most of this use was as successful salvage therapy in the setting of failing primary, secondary, or tertiary therapy and/or relapsing infection. Synergy between β-lactams and daptomycin is associated with several characteristics, including increased daptomycin binding and β-lactam–mediated potentiation of innate immunity, but the precise molecular mechanism is unknown.
Implications
Use of daptomycin in combination with other antibiotics, especially β-lactams, offers a promising treatment option for complicated MRSA bacteremia in which emergence of resistance during treatment may be anticipated. Because it is currently not possible to differentiate complicated from uncomplicated bacteremia at the time of presentation, combination therapy may be considered as first-line therapy, with de-escalation to monotherapy in uncomplicated cases and cases with stable pharmacologic and surgical source control.
Key words
Introduction
This article reviews all the published studies that used daptomycin combination therapy for the treatment of bacteremia and associated complicated infections caused by gram-positive organisms, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). We discuss the rationale of combination antibiotics and the mechanisms that enhance the activity of daptomycin, with special focus on the role of β-lactam antibiotics.
Results
Daptomycin
Daptomycin, a fermentation product of Streptomyces roseosporus, is a cyclic lipopeptide antibiotic with potent bactericidal activity against most gram-positive organisms. It is approved for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections and S aureus bacteremia, including those with right-sided infective endocarditis, caused by methicillin-susceptible S aureus and MRSA.
1
It has a unique structure among currently available antibiotics and a novel mechanism of action involving insertion of the lipophilic daptomycin tail into the bacterial cell membrane in a calcium-dependent manner, causing a potassium ion efflux and rapid membrane depolarization. This action is followed by arrest of DNA, RNA, and protein synthesis, resulting in bacterial cell death.2
In a simulated endocardial vegetation model, daptomycin remained bactericidal (99.9% kill within 24 hours) against stationary phase cultures of both methicillin-susceptible S aureus and MRSA present at high density (109 CFU).
3
Daptomycin demonstrates concentration-dependent activity, a half-life of 8 hours, a prolonged postantibiotic effect (PAE) up to 6.8 hours, and linear pharmacokinetics with minimal drug accumulation.4
Daptomycin is primarily renally excreted, with the majority of the drug remaining intact in the urine. Because of daptomycin׳s unique mechanism of action and because it is not metabolized by cytochrome P-450 or other hepatic enzymes, it has minimal drug interactions.5
, 6
Based on its concentration-dependent activity, linear pharmacokinetics, and favorable safety profile, daptomycin has been used and studied at higher-than-indicated doses. Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines from 2011 suggest using high-dose daptomycin (10 mg/kg/d), if the isolate is susceptible, in combination with another agent (eg, gentamicin 1 mg/kg IV every 8 hours, rifampin 600 mg PO/IV daily, or 300–450 mg PO/IV BID, linezolid 600 mg PO/IV BID, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole 5 mg/kg IV BID, or a β-lactam antibiotic) in the management of persistent MRSA bacteremia and vancomycin treatment failures in adult patients (B-III indication).
7
Overall rates of resistance of daptomycin in staphylococci and enterococci remain rare. However, there are numerous reports of emergence of resistance during treatment with daptomycin in settings of at least one of the following factors: (1) high inoculum infections; (2) endovascular infections; (3) infections of biomedical devices with prolonged retention; (4) bone and joint infections; (5) hemodialysis patients; and (6) lower than recommended doses of daptomycin monotherapy.
8
Mechanisms of daptomycin resistance are still being elucidated and remain diverse. Daptomycin-resistant S aureus is usually caused by modification of the cell membrane. Resistant isolates often exhibit progressive accumulation of single nucleotide polymorphisms in the multipeptide resistance factor gene (mprF) and the yycFG components of the yycFGHI operon. Both of these loci are involved in key cell membrane events. mprF is responsible for the synthesis and outer cell membrane translocation of positively charged lysyl-phosphatidylglycerol. The resultant phenotype readout is increased in the relative positive surface charge and is associated with decreased daptomycin binding. It has also been demonstrated that the VraSR 2-component regulatory system contributes to mprF-mediated decreased susceptibility to daptomycin.9
Other cell membrane mechanisms associated with daptomycin resistance in S aureus isolates are altered cell membrane order, increased cell membrane pigment production, resistance to depolarization and/or permeabilization, and reduced cell membrane peptidoglycan content. Modifications of the cell wall (including enhanced expression of dlt operon and progressive cell wall thickening) also contribute to daptomycin resistance.10
The mechanism of daptomycin resistance in enterococci may be associated with various gene mutations, increased septum formation, and alterations in membrane charge and phospholipid content. Whole-genome analysis suggests that mutations in several genes may play a role in the development of daptomycin resistance in enterococci. These include: (1) a 3-component regulatory system (designated liaFSR) that orchestrates the cell envelope response to antibiotics; (2) genes encoding proteins involved in phospholipid metabolism, including glycerophosphoryl diester phosphodiesterase (gdpD) and cardiolipin synthase (cls); and (3) a putative histidine kinase gene yycG, a member of the YycFG system that is involved in cell envelope homeostasis and daptomycin resistance in other gram-positive cocci. Nevertheless, none of the aforementioned gene mutations alone is sufficient to confer clinical levels of daptomycin resistance.
11
Furthermore, analysis of an isolated cave microbiome, in low G+C gram-positive bacteria, revealed a novel mechanism of daptomycin resistance that involved inactivation by hydrolytic cleavage of the ester bond between the threonine and kynurenine residues, resulting in ring-opening inactivation.
12
Rationale of Combination Antibiotics
Combinations of antibiotics are used to take advantage of the agents’ different mechanisms of action and toxicity profiles. Common indications for combination antibiotic therapy is broad-spectrum empiric treatment of life-threatening infections, treatment of polymicrobial infections, minimization of drug toxicity by using relatively low doses of ≥2 drugs with additive efficacies but independent toxicities, prevention of emergence of antibiotic resistance to a single agent, and exploitation of the possibility of synergistic inhibitory or bactericidal activities. Antibiotic synergy refers to a net increased antimicrobial effect resulting from the interaction of ≥2 drugs that is greater than the sum of their independent contributions.
13
, 14
Various mechanisms of this synergistic activity have been proposed. A cell wall–active agent with aminoglycoside proves synergistic activity, with increased intracellular uptake of aminoglycosides leading to enhanced killing and bactericidal activity in certain gram-positive organisms.
15
In addition, inactivating enzyme inhibitors (eg, a combination of a β-lactam agent plus β-lactamase inhibitors) are another possible mechanism of this synergistic activity. Other examples include combinations of drugs acting at proximate steps of a metabolic pathway (eg, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole rendering the combination drug bactericidal and less prone to resistance) and combinations of drugs acting at various levels of peptidoglycan synthesis (eg, β-lactams, fosfomycin, glycopeptides, and lipopeptides).16
Synergy in PAE is another possible mechanism. Synergistic PAEs have been observed classically in combinations of β-lactams with aminoglycosides and by addition of rifampin to other classes of drugs. Prolongation of PAE may provide higher protection against organism regrowth in situations when one or both antibiotics become subtherapeutic during the dosing interval.17
Disadvantages of combination therapy includes the possibility of antagonism, increased risk of adverse effects, risk of emergence of other resistant organisms, Clostridium difficile infection, and increased cost of therapy. Short-course, low-dose gentamicin combined with vancomycin for MRSA bacteremia and native valve endocarditis and in combination with other β-lactams may be associated with an increased risk of nephrotoxicity.18
, 19
Based on the National Healthcare Safety Network data, in 2009–2010, S aureus remained the most common cause of health care–associated infection, with MRSA accounting for >50% of the clinical S aureus isolates recovered in US hospitals.
20
Infection with MRSA is associated with increased morbidity, requirement for a longer duration of antibiotic therapy, higher health care costs, prolonged hospitalization, and an increased risk of death.21
S aureus bacteremia is associated with a poor outcome and a high rate of secondary infections such as infective endocarditis, septic arthritis, and osteomyelitis.22
Vancomycin has been the cornerstone of treatment of patients with serious MRSA infections for 5 decades. Consequently, vancomycin use has been increasing since the mid-1980s, resulting in the emergence of MRSA with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin. S aureus strains with reduced susceptibility can be divided into 3 categories; vancomycin-resistant strains (MIC, ≥16 μg/mL); vancomycin-intermediate strains (VISA; MIC, ≥4 μg/mL); and heterogeneous VISA, which have MIC <4 μg/mL but subpopulations that grow at higher MICs.Within the populations of S aureus that are considered to be susceptible, a changing pattern of vancomycin MICs has been observed in some centers, demonstrating an overall population drift in the clinical isolates of S aureus toward reduced vancomycin susceptibility. This phenomenon of “vancomycin MIC creep” varies considerably around the world and may not be uniformly applicable in all health care settings.
23
Infections caused by MRSA with higher vancomycin MICs are seen in patients with recent exposure to vancomycin within 1 month of the current infection, recent hospitalization, surgery within the last 6 months, and those with bloodstream infections before admission in intensive care units. In the treatment of MRSA bloodstream infections with vancomycin, higher vancomycin MIC values (≥1.5 μg/mL), regardless of MIC testing method and infection source, are predictive of treatment failure and associated with higher mortality.24
These data highlighting such poor outcomes in patients with serious MRSA infections (including bacteremia) suggest that in many of these instances, the treatment strategy of vancomycin specifically, and monotherapy in general, seems to be failing. Evidence is mounting that serious MRSA infections such as bacteremia may require combination antibiotic therapy for optimal management, improving antibiotic durability and slowing the rate of emergence of resistance.25
, 26
, 27
, 28
, 29
Although new antimicrobial drugs (eg, linezolid, daptomycin, tigecycline, telavancin, ceftaroline) have been developed, none has been shown to be consistently superior to vancomycin for the treatment of MRSA infections.
30
, 31
, 32
This finding is likely due to the fact that most of the randomized clinical trials comparing the newer antibiotics with vancomycin are restricted to relatively “low-risk” clinical situations because of the use stringent exclusionary criteria.The optimal treatment of complicated MRSA infections thus remains a challenge. Physicians and pharmacists are meeting these challenges in a variety of ways, including: (1) the adoption of rapid molecular tests to quickly differentiate MRSA from β-lactam– susceptible strains and, therefore, convert patients with the latter more rapidly to superior β-lactam therapy; (2) optimization of antibiotic doses targeting higher trough levels for vancomycin and higher daptomycin levels for breakthrough MRSA infections and serious vancomycin-resistant enterococci infections; (3) switching early-on to alternative agents for MRSA infections when vancomycin MIC is 2 mg/L; and (4) using combination antibiotic therapy.
The combination of high-dose daptomycin with a second antibiotic has been used to treat refractory S aureus bacteremia because: (1) vancomycin first-line therapy has been shown to elicit changes that confer cross-resistance to daptomycin
33
; (2) in vivo persistence under selection pressure from innate cationic host defense peptides also independently select for reduced susceptibility to daptomycin34
; and (3) organisms that establish endovascular infections such as endocarditis that frequently are the cause of persistent bacteremia demonstrate a fitness advantage of intrinsic resistance to cationic host defense peptides, with resulting increased heteroresistance to daptomycin.25
, 35
, 36
, 37
, 38
Combination of Antibiotics With Daptomycin: Clinical Data
In vitro data of interactions between daptomycin and other antibiotics have been reviewed extensively in other publications.
25
, 39
, 40
There are limited clinical data on the use of daptomycin in combination with other antibiotics. Most of this use has occurred in the setting of failing therapy and/or relapsing infection and “difficult to treat” infections. Characteristics of the antibiotics that were used in these studies, their mechanism of action, mechanism of resistance, and possible mechanisms of interactions with daptomycin are summarized in Table I.41
, 42
, 43
, 44
, 45
, 46
, 47
, - Moreira B.
- Boyle-Vavra S.
- deJonge B.L.
- Daum R.S.
Increased production of penicillin-binding protein 2, increased detection of other penicillin-binding proteins, and decreased coagulase activity associated with glycopeptide resistance in staphylococcus aureus.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997; 41: 1788-1793
48
, 49
, 50
, 51
, 52
, 53
, 54
, 55
, 56
Table ICharacteristics of antibiotics used as combination therapy with daptomycin (DAP).
Drug | Mechanism of Action | Mechanism of Resistance | Interaction With DAP |
---|---|---|---|
β-lactams |
|
|
|
Rifampin | Rifampin acts by interacting specifically with bacterial RNA polymerase encoded by the gene rpoB 50 |
|
|
TMP/SMT | The 2 components, TMP and SMT, work sequentially to inhibit enzyme systems involved in the bacterial synthesis of tetrahydrofolic acid. Reduced availability of tetrahydrofolic acid inhibits thymidine synthesis and, subsequently, DNA synthesis. The combination (TMP/SMT) has a broader spectrum of antimicrobial activity, is more rapidly bactericidal, and is less susceptible to the development of resistance than either of the component drugs 53 |
| In vitro synergy has been show with various antibiotics, including DAP |
Fosfomycin | Targets the bacterial mucopeptide synthesis by inhibiting phosphoenolpyruvate transferase, which is involved in peptidoglycan synthesis. This results in a broad-spectrum bactericidal effect 55 | In gram-positive organisms, resistance may be mediated by fosfomycin resistance proteins (FosA, FosB, or FoX) that chemically modify and inactivate the drug 55 |
|
PBP = penicillin-binding proteins; MRSA = methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; VRE = vancomycin-resistant enterococci; TMP/SMT = trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole.
Table II
23
, 57
, - Arias C.A.
- Torres H.A.
- Singh K.V.
- et al.
Failure of daptomycin monotherapy for endocarditis caused by an enterococcus faecium strain with vancomycin-resistant and vancomycin-susceptible subpopulations and evidence of in vivo loss of the vanA gene cluster.
Clin Infect Dis. 2007; 45 (http://dx.doi.org/CID50623 [pii]): 1343-1346
58
, 59
, 60
, 61
, 62
, 63
, 64
, 65
, 66
, 67
, 68
, 69
, 70
, 71
, 72
, 73
, 74
, 75
summarizes the clinical data regarding the use of daptomycin in combination with other antibiotics for the treatment of complicated bacteremia and other associated invasive infections caused by resistant gram-positive organisms. In these studies, daptomycin was used in combination with β-lactams, rifampin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, fosfomycin, tigecycline, and linezolid. Because most of the available clinical and in vitro data are for the combination therapy of daptomycin with various β-lactam agents, further discussion will focus primarily on this combination.Table IISummary of clinical studies with daptomycin (DAP) combination therapy for disseminated infections.
Study | Antibiotic | Infection | Outcome | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
Antibiotic combination of DAP + β-lactam agent | ||||
Arias et al, 57 2007
Failure of daptomycin monotherapy for endocarditis caused by an enterococcus faecium strain with vancomycin-resistant and vancomycin-susceptible subpopulations and evidence of in vivo loss of the vanA gene cluster. Clin Infect Dis. 2007; 45 (http://dx.doi.org/CID50623 [pii]): 1343-1346 | DAP 8 mg/kg/d | Enterococcus faecium (VRE) | Cure at 6-month follow-up | DAP heteroresistance noted |
Ampicillin 16 gm/d | MV endocarditis | DAP MIC, 2–4; ampicillin MIC, 16–34 | ||
Gentamicin 1 mg/kg q 12 × 6 weeks | Relapsing bacteremia | |||
Dhand and Sakoulas, 23 2011 | Daptomycin (high dose) + nafcillin/oxacillin | Series of 7 patients with noncatheter-associated persistent MRSA bacteremia | Rapid clearance of bacteremia after addition of β-lactam | Initial cure in 7 of 7 patients, with a delayed relapse in 2 of the 7 patients. One isolate developed DAP nonsusceptibility. In vitro studies showed enhanced DAP bactericidal activity, increased membrane DAP binding, and decreases in positive surface charge induced by ASBLs against DAP nonsusceptible MRSA |
Sakoulas et al, 58 2011 |
|
| Rapid clearance of persistent bacteremia | Addition of ampicillin to DAP in vitro enhanced DAP activity and binding, changed the antibiotic profile from static to bactericidal, showed slow reduction in net positive surface charge, and made VRE more susceptible to killing by innate immune response mediated by cationic host defense peptides |
Rose et al, 59 2012 |
|
| Clearance of bacteremia | Ceftaroline restored DAP sensitivity in vivo. Improved DAP susceptibility in vitro in presence of oxacillin and ceftaroline. Rapid and sustained bactericidal activity |
Combination prevented emergence of DAP resistance in vitro. In DNSA, higher dose of DAP is required to optimize cell membrane damage | ||||
Sierra-Hoffman et al, 60 2012 |
|
| Cure at 12-month follow-up |
|
Moise et al, 61 2013 | Daptomycin with and without β-lactam |
| Addition of rifampin or gentamicin or vancomycin to DAP did not result in any significant change in outcome | |
Sakoulas et al, 62 2013 |
|
|
|
|
Antibiotic combination of DAP + rifampin | ||||
Stevens and Edmond, 63 2005 |
|
| No microbiologic reoccurrence after 4 weeks of completion | In vitro synergy noted between DAP/rifampin/gentamicin |
Ahmad and Rojtman, 64 2010 |
|
|
| No in vitro synergy was noted |
Lee et al, 65 2008 |
| MRSA Bacteremia, Likely AV graft infection, Septic brain emboli, meningitis | Cure | MRSA DAP MIC, 1 Leukocytoclastic vasculitis with vancomycin. Rifampin added for CNS disease |
Jugun et al, 66 2013 |
| Gram-positive osteoarticular infections, N = 16 (staphylococcal, n = 15, streptococcal, n = 1) | Successful outcomes at >1-year follow-up | Median duration of treatment was 21 days (range, 10–122 days). Combination therapy well tolerated. Prosthetic device removal in 5 of 16, device exchange in 4 of 16, and device retention in 4 of 16 |
Rose et al, 67 2013 | DAP 4–8 mg/kg/dose Rifampin 300–600 mg/d | MRSA (n = 12) Osteoarticular (N = 9) HD catheter infection (1) Prosthetic valve endocarditis (1) | Cure in 9 of 12 patients | Checkerboard synergy was seen in 9 of 12 patients and was predictive of therapeutic success. Failure seen in prosthetic joint infection and deep abscess |
Antibiotic combination of DAP + TMP/SMT | ||||
Avery et al, 68 2012 | DAP 10 mg/kg/dose TMP/SMT IV to oral | DNSA, VISA 1. Bacteremia with vertebral osteomyelitis 2. Bacteremia, TV endocarditis, osteomyelitis |
| Suppression with oral TMP/SMT; course complicated by reversible myopathy and renal failure. In vitro combination showed sustained bactericidal activity at 36 to 48 hours |
DiCarlo et al, 69 2013 | DAP 8 mg/kg/dose TMP/SMT 15 mg/kg/d | MRSA bacteremia MV endocarditis Intracranial hemorrhage | Cure | 6 weeks of oral TMP/SMT after 6 weeks of combination IV therapy VAN MIC, 2 |
Antibiotic combination of DAP + fosfomycin | ||||
Miro et al, 70 2012 | DAP 10 mg/kg/d | 3 cases of left-sided endocarditis | Alive at >6-month follow-up | In vitro activity of combination against (7 MSSA, 5 MRSA, 2 GISA) isolates showed synergy in 79% of isolates and bactericidal activity in 57% of isolates. Combination therapy was well tolerated |
FOS 2 g q 6 h | (MRSA, n = 2; MSSA, n = 1) | |||
Chen et al, 71 2011 | DAP 12 mg/kg/d FOS 6 g q 6 h | MRSA/DNSA bacteremia, AICD infection, endocarditis, osteomyelitis | Cure | Delayed surgical removal of pacing wire. Eight weeks of intravenous therapy. Combination well tolerated. In vitro additive effect. |
Teng et al, 72 2012 | DAP 12 mg/kg/d | MSSA, VT-MRSA | Cure | Combination well tolerated |
FOS 6 g q 6 h | Bacteremia, | |||
MV endocarditis, osteomyelitis | ||||
Antibiotic combination of DAP + tigecycline | ||||
Jenkins, 73 2007 | DAP 6 mg/kg/dose | E faecium (VRE) | Cure at 16-week follow-up | |
Tigecycline 50 mg q 12 h | MV endocarditis | |||
× 70 d | DAP MIC, 4 | |||
Schutt and Bohm, 74 2009 | DAP 8 mg/kg/dose Tigecycline 50 mg q 12 h | E faecium (VRE) Bacteremia Possible TV endocarditis with pulmonary septic emboli | Rapid clearance of refractory bacteremia | Resistant to vancomycin, linezolid. DAP MIC, 3–4 |
Antibiotic combination of DAP + linezolid + rifampin | ||||
Kelesidis et al, 75 2011 | DAP × 6 weeks Linezolid 600 mg q 12 h Rifampin 300 mg q 12 h | MRSA prosthetic device infection, bacteremia, meningitis, osteomyelitis | Cure after removal of shunt and combination antibiotics | In vitro analysis found that combination of linezolid with DAP produced indifference in checkerboard analysis and antagonism in time-kill assays. The addition of rifampin to the combination linezolid + DAP resulted in synergy in the time-kill assays when tested at 0.5 times the MICs for each drug and achieved 99.9% killing significantly quicker than the other combinations |
VRE = vancomycin-resistant enterococci; MV = mitral valve; MRSA = methicillin- resistant Staphylococcus aureus; ASBL = antistaphylococal β-lactam; DNSA = DAP nonsusceptible S aureus; VISA = vancomycin-intermediate S aureus; HD = hemodialysis; CORE = Cubicin Outcomes Registry and Experience; AVR = aortic valve replacement; AV = arteriovenous; CNS = central nervous system; TMP/SXT = trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole; FOS = fosfomycin; TV = tricuspid valve; MSSA = methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus; GISA = glycopeptide-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus; AICD = automated implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; VT = vancomycin tolerant.
Daptomycin and β-Lactam Combination Therapy
Daptomycin and β-lactam combinations have been used successfully and increasingly as salvage treatment for refractory or relapsing infections caused by resistant gram-positive organisms (Table II). In addition to the “see-saw” effect,
76
the improved outcomes are based on:- •Synergy: β-lactam exposure increases the net surface negative charge on the bacterial cell wall leading to increased binding of the positively charged daptomycin Ca2+ complex, resulting in synergy and enhanced killing of resistant gram-positive organisms.23,42,58
- •β-lactam–mediated increased killing by various cationic host defense peptides (HDPs): Increased resistance to vancomycin and daptomycin is associated with concomitant resistant to various HDPs that are produced by platelets, leukocytes, and keratinocytes.35Antistaphylococal β-lactams sensitize MRSA for augmented clearance by innate immune effectors such as HDP and phagocytes and therefore augment the synergistic activity between these antistaphylococal β-lactams and daptomycin.23,42,77
- •Prevention of emergence of resistance: β-lactams when used along with daptomycin prevent the emergence of resistance to daptomycin in clinical MRSA isolates and in enterococci.48,49,59,78
Unique Role of Ceftaroline
Unlike other β-lactams, ceftaroline has activity against MRSA, heterogeneous VISA, VISA, vancomycin-resistant strains, and daptomycin-nonsusceptible S aureus, which is mediated by binding to PBP2a with 128 times greater affinity than any other clinically available β-lactam.
79
Because PBP2a on the cell surface decreases with reduced glycopeptide and lipopeptide susceptibility, the enhanced activity of daptomycin mediated by ceftaroline is likely a result of synergistic activity as well. Ceftaroline has been used in combination with daptomycin to eradicate resistant S aureus and enterococcal infections and offers an attractive and potent therapeutic option for the treatment of resistant gram-positive infections.59
, 62
, 77
, 80
Is the Synergistic Activity of All β-Lactams With Daptomycin the Same?
While nafcilln and oxacillin enhance daptomycin and killing of MRSA, b-lactam antibiotics with penicillin-binding protein-1 (PBP1) binding demonstrate enhance the activity of daptomycin compared to those with relatively less PBP1 binding (cefoxitin, and cefaclor).
81
The mechanism for this specificity is unknown. However, given that PBP1 is a critical component of cell divisome formation that may be a compensatory response to daptomycin membrane insertion for initiation of surface repair, PBP1 inhibition or interference by β-lactam antibiotics that bind it may result in cell death with fewer daptomycin molecules inserted per cell (G.S., unpublished observations).82
Conclusions
A severe limitation in the treatment of S aureus bacteremia is that it takes several days for “complicated” versus “uncomplicated” situations to be determined.
83
In the meantime, however, under current first-line monotherapy treatment approaches frequently used with vancomycin, complicated infections are exacerbated by selection of drug resistance and consequent treatment failure. Currently, there is no way to risk-stratify the complicated versus uncomplicated cases early-on, although some research points to potential use of biomarkers to predict treatment failure and patient death. In light of the positive data that are emerging with combination therapy, particularly with daptomycin plus β-lactams in MRSA bacteremia, it may be reasonable to initiate combination therapy for 3 to 5 days and then de-escalate treatment based on clinical and microbiologic responses. Although much remains to be determined, including questions such as which β-lactam to use in the early empiric approach and the role of vancomycin in combination therapy schemes, the current data indicating such poor outcomes in MRSA bacteremia suggest that an alternative approach is required. There is insufficient clinical data using the combination of daptomycin with other antibiotics such as fosfomycin, linezolid, tigecycline, gentamicin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in the treatment of MRSA bacteremia; further clinical studies are required to assess their efficacy and long-term tolerability. Early consultation with infectious diseases has increasingly been shown to improve mortality and other outcomes in S aureus bacteremia.84
, 85
The early use of combination therapy for treatment of MRSA bacteremia, especially in clinical settings in which emergence of resistance during treatment is known to occur, may be an additional benefit that infectious diseases clinicians can offer to these patients with the goal of improving outcomes.Conflicts of Interest
Dr. Dhand is a member of a speaker’s bureau and has received speaking honoraria from Cubist Pharmaceuticals; he is also a consultant for Astellas and Theravance. Dr. Sakoulas is a member of a speaker’s bureau and has received speaking honoraria from Cubist, Forest, Astellas, and Pfizer Pharmaceuticals; he has also received grant support and consulting fees from Cubist Pharmaceuticals.
Acknowledgments
Both authors contributed equally to the literature search, data interpretation, figure creation, and writing of the manuscript.
References
- Daptomycin: A lipopeptide antibiotic for the treatment of serious Gram-positive infections.J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005; 55 (http://dx.doi.org/dkh546 [pii]): 283-288
- Correlation of daptomycin bactericidal activity and membrane depolarization in staphylococcus aureus.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003; 47: 2538-2544
- Daptomycin.Pharmacotherapy. 2004; 24: 41-57
- Daptomycin pharmacokinetics and safety following administration of escalating doses once daily to healthy subjects.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003; 47: 1318-1323
- In vivo pharmacodynamic activity of daptomycin.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004; 48: 63-68
- An evaluation of the P450 inhibition and induction potential of daptomycin in primary human hepatocytes.Chem Biol Interact. 2004; 150 (http://dx.doi.org/S0009-2797(04)00105-X [pii]): 137-147
- Clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America for the treatment of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus infections in adults and children: Executive summary.Clin Infect Dis. 2011; 52: 285-292https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cir034
- Susceptibility relationship between vancomycin and daptomycin in staphylococcus aureus: Facts and assumptions.Lancet Infect Dis. 2009; 9: 617-624https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(09)70200-2
- VraSR two-component regulatory system contributes to mprF-mediated decreased susceptibility to daptomycin in in vivo-selected clinical strains of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012; 56: 92-102https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00432-10
- Mechanisms of daptomycin resistance in staphylococcus aureus: Role of the cell membrane and cell wall.Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2013; 1277: 139-158https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06819.x
- Genetic basis for in vivo daptomycin resistance in enterococci.N Engl J Med. 2011; 365: 892-900https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1011138
- Antibiotic resistance is prevalent in an isolated cave microbiome.PLoS One. 2012; 7: e34953https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034953
- Rationale for use of antimicrobial combinations.Am J Med. 1983; 75: 4-8
- Synergism and antagonism.Infect Dis Clin North Am. 1989; 3: 399-406
- Interaction between beta-lactam and other antibiotics.Rev Infect Dis. 1986; 8: S305-S314
- Combination antimicrobial therapy for bacterial infections. Guidelines for the clinician.Drugs. 1996; 52: 390-405
- Comparative dose-effect relations at several dosing intervals for beta-lactam, aminoglycoside and quinolone antibiotics against Gram-negative bacilli in murine thigh-infection and pneumonitis models.Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1990; 74: 179-184
- Initial low-dose gentamicin for staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and endocarditis is nephrotoxic.Clin Infect Dis. 2009; 48: 713-721https://doi.org/10.1086/597031
- Severity of gentamicin’s nephrotoxic effect on patients with infective endocarditis: A prospective observational cohort study of 373 patients.Clin Infect Dis. 2009; 48: 65-71https://doi.org/10.1086/594122
- Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with healthcare-associated infections: Summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2009-2010.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013; 34: 1-14https://doi.org/10.1086/668770
- Comparison of mortality associated with methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: A meta-analysis.Clin Infect Dis. 2003; 36: 53-59https://doi.org/10.1086/345476
- Clinical identifiers of complicated staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.Arch Intern Med. 2003; 163: 2066-2072https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.163.17.2066
- Reduced vancomycin susceptibility among clinical staphylococcus aureus isolates (‘the MIC creep’): Implications for therapy.F1000 Med Rep. 2012; 4 (4-4. Epub 2012 Feb 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.3410/M4-4)
- The clinical significance of vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration in staphylococcus aureus infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Clin Infect Dis. 2012; 54: 755-771https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cir935
- Daptomycin: The role of high-dose and combination therapy for Gram-positive infections.Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2013; 42: 202-210https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2013.05.005
- Use of antistaphylococcal beta-lactams to increase daptomycin activity in eradicating persistent bacteremia due to methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus: Role of enhanced daptomycin binding.Clin Infect Dis. 2011; 53: 158-163https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cir340
- The empirical combination of vancomycin and a beta-lactam for staphylococcal bacteremia.Clin Infect Dis. 2013; 57: 1760-1765https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cit560
- Antimicrobial salvage therapy for persistent staphylococcal bacteremia using daptomycin plus ceftaroline.Clin Ther. 2014 July; 10 (http://dx.doi.org/S0149-2918(14)00319-1 [pii])
- Beta-lactams enhance vancomycin activity against methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus bacteremia compared to vancomycin alone.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014; 58: 102-109https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01204-13
- New insights into methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) pathogenesis, treatment and resistance.Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2012; 39: 96-104https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.09.028
- Alternative agents to vancomycin for the treatment of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus infections.Am J Ther. 2013; 20: 200-212https://doi.org/10.1097/MJT.0b013e31821109ec
- Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus therapy: Past, present, and future.Clin Infect Dis. 2014; 58: S20-S27https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cit614
- Induction of daptomycin heterogeneous susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus by exposure to vancomycin.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006; 50: 1581-1585
- Reduced susceptibility to host-defense cationic peptides and daptomycin coemerge in methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus from daptomycin-naive bacteremic patients.J Infect Dis. 2012; 206 (http://dx.doi.org/jis482 [pii]): 1160-1167
- Emergence of daptomycin resistance in daptomycin-naive rabbits with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic joint infection is associated with resistance to host defense cationic peptides and mprF polymorphisms.PLoS One. 2013; 8: e71151
- Factors influencing time to vancomycin-induced clearance of nonendocarditis methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: role of platelet microbicidal protein killing and agr genotypes.J Infect Dis. 2010; 201: 233-240
- In vitro resistance to thrombin-induced platelet microbicidal protein among clinical bacteremic isolates of Staphylococcus aureus correlates with an endovascular infectious source.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998; 42: 3169-3172
- Reduced susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus to vancomycin and platelet microbicidal protein correlates with defective autolysis and loss of accessory gene regulator (agr) function.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005; 49: 2687-2692
- Effects of daptomycin in combination with other antimicrobial agents: A review of in vitro and animal model studies.J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009; 64: 1130-1138https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkp346
- Antibiotic combinations with daptomycin for treatment of staphylococcus aureus infections.Chemother Res Pract. 2011; 2011: 619321https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/619321
- Penicillin-binding protein-mediated resistance in pneumococci and staphylococci.J Infect Dis. 1999; 179: S353-S359https://doi.org/10.1086/513854
- Nafcillin enhances innate immune-mediated killing of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus.J Mol Med (Berl). 2014; 92: 139-149https://doi.org/10.1007/s00109-013-1100-7
- Subinhibitory concentrations of beta-lactam induce haemolytic activity in staphylococcus aureus through the SaeRS two-component system.FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2007; 268 (http://dx.doi.org/FML568 [pii]): 98-105
- Extraction of a highly potent penicillin inactivator from penicillin resistant staphylococci.Science. 1944; 99 (http://dx.doi.org/99/2579/452 [pii]): 452-453
- The rise of the enterococcus: Beyond vancomycin resistance.Nat Rev Microbiol. 2012; 10: 266-278https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2761
- Daptomycin-oxacillin combinations in treatment of experimental endocarditis caused by daptomycin-nonsusceptible strains of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus with evolving oxacillin susceptibility (the “seesaw effect”).Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010; 54: 3161-3169https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00487-10
- Increased production of penicillin-binding protein 2, increased detection of other penicillin-binding proteins, and decreased coagulase activity associated with glycopeptide resistance in staphylococcus aureus.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997; 41: 1788-1793
- In vitro prevention of the emergence of daptomycin resistance in staphylococcus aureus and enterococci following combination with amoxicillin/clavulanic acid or ampicillin.Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2010; 35: 451-456https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2009.12.022
- Beta-lactams increase the antibacterial activity of daptomycin against clinical methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus strains and prevent selection of daptomycin-resistant derivatives.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012; 56: 6192-6200https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01525-12
- Structural mechanism for rifampicin inhibition of bacterial RNA polymerase.Cell. 2001; 104 (http://dx.doi.org/S0092-8674(01)00286-0 [pii]): 901-912
- Molecular characterization of rpoB mutations conferring cross-resistance to rifamycins on methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999; 43: 2813-2816
- Daptomycin synergy with rifampicin and ampicillin against vancomycin-resistant enterococci.J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004; 53: 530-532https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkh104
- Mechanism of action of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.I. J Infect Dis. 1973; 128: 433-436
- Role of folate antagonists in the treatment of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus infection.Clin Infect Dis. 2008; 46: 584-593https://doi.org/10.1086/525536
- Fosfomycin: An old--new antibiotic.Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012; 18: 4-7https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03636.x
- Fosfomycin for the treatment of infections caused by Gram-positive cocci with advanced antimicrobial drug resistance: A review of microbiological, animal and clinical studies.Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2009; 18: 921-944https://doi.org/10.1517/13543780902967624
- Failure of daptomycin monotherapy for endocarditis caused by an enterococcus faecium strain with vancomycin-resistant and vancomycin-susceptible subpopulations and evidence of in vivo loss of the vanA gene cluster.Clin Infect Dis. 2007; 45 (http://dx.doi.org/CID50623 [pii]): 1343-1346
- Ampicillin enhances daptomycin- and cationic host defense peptide-mediated killing of ampicillin- and vancomycin-resistant enterococcus faecium.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012; 56: 838-844https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.05551-11
- Addition of ceftaroline to daptomycin after emergence of daptomycin-nonsusceptible staphylococcus aureus during therapy improves antibacterial activity.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012; 56: 5296-5302https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00797-12
- Combination therapy with ampicillin and daptomycin for treatment of enterococcus faecalis endocarditis.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012; 56 (Epub 2012 Sep 10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01760-12): 6064
- Multicenter evaluation of the clinical outcomes of daptomycin with and without concomitant beta-lactams in patients with staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and mild to moderate renal impairment.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013; 57: 1192-1200https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.02192-12
- Treatment of high-level gentamicin-resistant enterococcus faecalis endocarditis with daptomycin plus ceftaroline.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013; 57: 4042-4045https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.02481-12
- Endocarditis due to vancomycin-resistant enterococci: Case report and review of the literature.Clin Infect Dis. 2005; 41 (http://dx.doi.org/CID36227 [pii]): 1134-1142
- Successful treatment of daptomycin-nonsusceptible methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus bacteremia with the addition of rifampin to daptomycin.Ann Pharmacother. 2010; 44: 918-921https://doi.org/10.1345/aph.1M665
- Successful treatment of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus meningitis with daptomycin.Clin Infect Dis. 2008; 47: 588-590https://doi.org/10.1086/590257
- The safety and efficacy of high-dose daptomycin combined with rifampicin for the treatment of Gram-positive osteoarticular infections.Int Orthop. 2013; 37: 1375-1380https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-1856-y
- Relationship of in vitro synergy and treatment outcome with daptomycin plus rifampin in patients with invasive methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus infections.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013; 57: 3450-3452https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00325-12
- Daptomycin-nonsusceptible vancomycin-intermediate staphylococcus aureus vertebral osteomyelitis cases complicated by bacteremia treated with high-dose daptomycin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012; 56: 5990-5993https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01046-12
- High dose of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and daptomycin as a therapeutic option for MRSA endocarditis with large vegetation complicated by embolic stroke: A case report and literature review.Infez Med. 2013; 21: 45-49
- High-dose daptomycin plus fosfomycin is safe and effective in treating methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus endocarditis.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012; 56 (http://dx.doi.org/AAC.06449-11 [pii]): 4511-4515
- High-dose daptomycin and fosfomycin treatment of a patient with endocarditis caused by daptomycin-nonsusceptible staphylococcus aureus: Case report.BMC Infect Dis. 2011; 11: 152https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-11-152
- Combination therapy of daptomycin and fosfomycin for vancomycin tolerant methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus endocarditis complicating metastatic osteomyelitis.J Exp Clin Med. 2012; 4: 290-291
- Linezolid- and vancomycin-resistant enterococcus faecium endocarditis: Successful treatment with tigecycline and daptomycin.J Hosp Med. 2007; 2: 343-344https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.236
- Multidrug-resistant enterococcus faecium endocarditis treated with combination tigecycline and high-dose daptomycin.Ann Pharmacother. 2009; 43: 2108-2112https://doi.org/10.1345/aph.1M324
- Combination therapy with daptomycin, linezolid, and rifampin as treatment option for MRSA meningitis and bacteremia.Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011; 71: 286-290https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2011.07.001
- Reduced glycopeptide and lipopeptide susceptibility in staphylococcus aureus and the “seesaw effect”: Taking advantage of the back door left open?.Drug Resist Updat. 2013; 16: 73-79https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drup.2013.10.002
- Ceftaroline restores daptomycin activity against daptomycin-nonsusceptible vancomycin-resistant enterococcus faecium.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014; 58: 1494-1500https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.02274-13
- Altering the proclivity towards daptomycin resistance in methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus using combinations with other antibiotics.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012; 56: 5046-5053https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00502-12
- Affinity of ceftaroline and other beta-lactams for penicillin-binding proteins from staphylococcus aureus and streptococcus pneumoniae.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010; 54: 1670-1677https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00019-10
- Ceftaroline increases membrane binding and enhances the activity of daptomycin against daptomycin-nonsusceptible vancomycin-intermediate staphylococcus aureus in a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013; 57: 66-73https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01586-12
- Beta-lactam antibiotics targeting PBP1 selectively enhance daptomycin activity against methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013; 57: 5005-5012https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00594-13
- Daptomycin-mediated reorganization of membrane architecture causes mislocalization of essential cell division proteins.J Bacteriol. 2012; 194: 4494-4504https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00011-12
Kullar R, McKinnell JA, Sakoulas G. Avoiding the perfect storm: The biologic and clinical case for reevaluating the 7-day expectation for methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus bacteremia before switching therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 2014. http://dx.doi.org/ciu583 [pii].
- The value of infectious diseases consultation in staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.Am J Med. 2010; 123: 631-637https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.01.015
- Infectious diseases specialty intervention is associated with decreased mortality and lower healthcare costs.Clin Infect Dis. 2014; 58: 22-28https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cit610
Article info
Publication history
Accepted:
September 14,
2014
Identification
Copyright
© 2014 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.