Advertisement
Pharmaceutical economics & health policy Original research| Volume 34, ISSUE 7, P1531-1543, July 2012

Cost-Effectiveness of Lanthanum Carbonate in the Treatment of Hyperphosphatemia in Dialysis Patients: A Canadian Payer Perspective

      Abstract

      Background

      Hyperphosphatemia is a common and potentially harmful condition in patients with end-stage kidney disease. In Canada, first-line treatment of hyperphosphatemia consists primarily of calcium carbonate (CC). Lanthanum carbonate (LC) and sevelamer hydrochloride (SH) are non–calcium phosphate binders that have been used as second-line therapy in patients intolerant of or not responsive to CC.

      Objectives

      The primary objective of the present study was to assess the costs and clinical benefits of second-line use of LC after therapy failure with CC in patients receiving dialysis, from a Canadian payer perspective. The secondary objective was to perform an economic comparison between second-line LC therapy and second-line SH therapy, from a Canadian payer perspective. Short-term outcomes were treatment response and cost per additional responder, and long-term outcomes were survival, number of all-cause hospitalizations, and quality of life.

      Methods

      A cost-effectiveness Markov model was populated with simulated cohorts of 1000 patients receiving incident dialysis, followed life-long. Patients not responsive to CC with a serum phosphate concentration >1.78 mmol/L (>5.5 mg/dL) received a trial regimen with LC. Patients not responsive to LC returned to CC therapy. Patient data from a randomized controlled trial of 800 patients receiving dialysis were used. Extensive (probabilistic) sensitivity analyses were performed. When available, model parameters were based on Canadian data or from a Canadian perspective. All costs are in 2010 Canadian dollars (C$).

      Results

      Results of the model estimated that in patients responsive to second-line LC therapy, survival increased, on average, 0.44 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35–0.54) per patient when compared with continued CC therapy. The mean (range) costs per patient in the first year of treatment with LC was C$2600 (C$2400–C$2800). Over patients' lifetimes, the second-line LC strategy resulted in a gain of 48.8 (37.1–61.3) life-years and 29.3 (21.4–38.1) quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). The cost-effectiveness of the second-line LC strategy was C$7900 (C$1800–C$14,600) per life-year and C$13,200 (C$3000–C$25,100) per QALY gained. Most sensitivity analyses did not change the cost-effectiveness outcomes; however, including unrelated future costs raised the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio to C$159,500 (95% confidence interval, C$133,300–C$191,600) per QALY gained. Compared with second-line SH therapy, second-line LC therapy had similar effectiveness and was 23% less expensive.

      Conclusions

      Second-line treatment with LC is cost-effective in the treatment of end-stage kidney disease in patients with hyperphosphatemia, from a Canadian payer perspective. Second-line treatment with LC is less expensive, with similar effectiveness as second-line treatment with SH. The primary limitation of health economic evaluations of phosphate binders is the relative scarcity of clinical data on the association between phosphate concentration and long-term outcome.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Therapeutics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Canadian Institute for Health Information
        Canadian Organ Replacement Register Annual Report: Treatment of End-Stage Organ Failure in Canada, 2001 to 2010.
        CIHI, Ottawa, Ont2011
        • Kestenbaum B.
        • Sampson J.N.
        • Rudser K.D.
        • et al.
        Serum phosphate levels and mortality risk among people with chronic kidney disease.
        J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005; 16: 520-528
        • Albaaj F.
        • Hutchison A.
        Hyperphosphataemia in renal failure: causes, consequences and current management.
        Drugs. 2003; 63: 577-596
        • Block G.A.
        • Hulbert-Shearon T.E.
        • Levin N.W.
        • Port F.K.
        Association of serum phosphorus and calcium x phosphate product with mortality risk in chronic hemodialysis patients: a national study.
        Am J Kidney Dis. 1998; 31: 607-617
        • Block G.A.
        • Klassen P.S.
        • Lazarus J.M.
        • et al.
        Mineral metabolism, mortality, and morbidity in maintenance hemodialysis.
        J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004; 15: 2208-2218
        • Menon V.
        • Greene T.
        • Pereira A.A.
        • et al.
        Relationship of phosphorus and calcium-phosphorus product with mortality in CKD.
        Am J Kidney Dis. 2005; 46: 455-463
        • Abramowitz M.
        • Muntner P.
        • Coco M.
        • et al.
        Serum alkaline phosphatase and phosphate and risk of mortality and hospitalization.
        Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010; 5: 1064-1071
        • Jindal K.
        • Chan C.T.
        • Deziel C.
        • et al.
        Hemodialysis clinical practice guidelines for the Canadian Society of Nephrology.
        J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006; 17: S1-S27
        • National Kidney Foundation
        K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for bone metabolism and disease in chronic kidney disease.
        Am J Kidney Dis. 2003; 42: S1-S201
        • Tonelli M.
        • Pannu N.
        • Manns B.
        Oral phosphate binders in patients with kidney failure.
        N Engl J Med. 2010; 362: 1312-1324
        • Rees L.
        • Shroff R.C.
        Phosphate binders in CKD: chalking out the differences.
        Pediatr Nephrol. 2010; 25: 385-394
        • Wazny L.D.
        • Raymond C.B.
        • Lesperance E.M.
        • Bernstein K.N.
        Are CSN and NKF-K/DOQI mineral metabolism guidelines for hemodialysis patients achievable? results from a provincial renal program [in English and French].
        CANNT J. 2008; 18 (44–50; quiz 42–43, 51–52): 36-41
        • Chertow G.M.
        • Raggi P.
        • Chasan-Taber S.
        • et al.
        Determinants of progressive vascular calcification in haemodialysis patients.
        Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004; 19: 1489-1496
        • Toussaint N.D.
        • Lau K.K.
        • Polkinghorne K.R.
        • Kerr P.G.
        Attenuation of aortic calcification with lanthanum carbonate versus calcium-based phosphate binders in haemodialysis: a pilot randomized controlled trial.
        Nephrology (Carlton). 2011; 16: 290-298
        • Shigematsu T.
        Multicenter prospective randomized, double-blind comparative study between lanthanum carbonate and calcium carbonate as phosphate binders in Japanese hemodialysis patients with hyperphosphatemia.
        Clin Nephrol. 2008; 70: 404-410
        • Hutchison A.J.
        • Maes B.
        • Vanwalleghem J.
        • et al.
        Efficacy, tolerability, and safety of lanthanum carbonate in hyperphosphatemia: a 6-month, randomized, comparative trial versus calcium carbonate.
        Nephron Clin Pract. 2005; 100: c8-c19
        • Curran M.P.
        • Robinson D.M.
        Lanthanum carbonate: a review of its use in lowering serum phosphate in patients with end-stage renal disease.
        Drugs. 2009; 69: 2329-2349
        • Sprague S.M.
        A comparative review of the efficacy and safety of established phosphate binders: calcium, sevelamer, and lanthanum carbonate.
        Curr Med Res Opin. 2007; 23: 3167-3175
        • Block G.A.
        • Spiegel D.M.
        • Ehrlich J.
        • et al.
        Effects of sevelamer and calcium on coronary artery calcification in patients new to hemodialysis.
        Kidney Int. 2005; 68: 1815-1824
        • Sprague S.M.
        • Abboud H.
        • Qiu P.
        • et al.
        Lanthanum carbonate reduces phosphorus burden in patients with CKD stages 3 and 4: a randomized trial.
        Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009; 4: 178-185
        • Noto L.
        Lanthanum carbonate provides control of phosphorus levels in patients new to phosphate binder therapy and patients changed from other phosphate binders.
        J Ren Nutr. 2011; 21: 277-282
        • Goto S.
        • Komaba H.
        • Moriwaki K.
        • et al.
        Clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of lanthanum carbonate as second-line therapy in hemodialysis patients in Japan.
        Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011; 6: 1375-1384
        • Brennan A.
        • Akehurst R.
        • Davis S.
        • et al.
        The cost-effectiveness of lanthanum carbonate in the treatment of hyperphosphatemia in patients with end-stage renal disease.
        Value Health. 2007; 10: 32-41
        • Park H.
        • Rascati K.L.
        • Keith M.S.
        • et al.
        Cost-effectiveness of lanthanum carbonate versus sevelamer hydrochloride for the treatment of hyperphosphatemia in patients with end-stage renal disease: a US payer perspective.
        Value Health. 2011; 14: 1002-1009
        • Huybrechts K.F.
        • Caro J.J.
        • O'Brien J.A.
        Prevention and management of hyperphosphatemia with sevelamer in Canada: health and economic consequences.
        Value Health. 2009; 12: 16-19
        • Manns B.
        • Klarenbach S.
        • Lee H.
        • et al.
        Economic evaluation of sevelamer in patients with end-stage renal disease.
        Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007; 22: 2867-2878
        • Vegter S.
        • Tolley K.
        • Keith M.S.
        • Postma M.J.
        Cost-effectiveness of lanthanum carbonate in the treatment of hyperphosphatemia in chronic kidney disease before and during dialysis.
        Value Health. 2011; 14: 852-858
      1. Guidelines for the Economic Evaluation of Health Technologies: Canada.
        Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, Ottawa, Ont, Canada2006
        • Wilson R.
        • Adena M.
        • Hodgkins P.
        • et al.
        Meta-analysis of dose relativity for the non-calcium phosphate binders lanthanum and sevelamer.
        Poster presented at: XLVIII European Renal Association–European Dialysis and Transplant Association Congress. June 23–26 2011; (Czech Republic)
        • Daugirdas J.T.
        • Finn W.F.
        • Emmett M.
        • Chertow G.M.
        The phosphate binder equivalent dose.
        Semin Dial. 2011; 24: 41-49
        • Sprague S.M.
        • Ross E.A.
        • Nath S.D.
        • et al.
        Lanthanum carbonate vs. sevelamer hydrochloride for the reduction of serum phosphorus in hemodialysis patients: a crossover study.
        Clin Nephrol. 2009; 72: 252-258
        • Hutchison A.J.
        • Barnett M.E.
        • Krause R.
        • et al.
        Long-term efficacy and safety profile of lanthanum carbonate: results for up to 6 years of treatment.
        Nephron Clin Pract. 2008; 110: c-15-c23
        • Tonelli M.
        • Manns B.
        • Culleton B.
        • et al.
        Association between proximity to the attending nephrologist and mortality among patients receiving hemodialysis.
        CMAJ. 2007; 177: 1039-1044
        • Goeree R.
        • Manalich J.
        • Grootendorst P.
        • et al.
        Cost analysis of dialysis treatments for end-stage renal disease (ESRD).
        Clin Invest Med. 1995; 18: 455-464
        • Murphy S.W.
        • Foley R.N.
        • Barrett B.J.
        • et al.
        Comparative hospitalization of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients in Canada.
        Kidney Int. 2000; 57: 2557-2563
        • Kalantar-Zadeh K.
        • Kopple J.D.
        • Block G.
        • Humphreys M.H.
        Association among SF36 quality of life measures and nutrition, hospitalization, and mortality in hemodialysis.
        J Am Soc Nephrol. 2001; 12: 2797-2806
        • Jamal S.A.
        • Fitchett D.
        • Lok C.E.
        • et al.
        The effects of calcium-based versus non-calcium-based phosphate binders on mortality among patients with chronic kidney disease: a meta-analysis.
        Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009; 24: 3168-3174
        • Regie de l'assurance maladie Quebec
        Canadian formulary prices.
        (Accessed July 1, 2010.)
        • Lee H.
        • Manns B.
        • Taub K.
        • et al.
        Cost analysis of ongoing care of patients with end-stage renal disease: the impact of dialysis modality and dialysis access.
        Am J Kidney Dis. 2002; 40: 611-622
        • Lee R.H.
        Future costs in cost effectiveness analysis.
        J Health Econ. 2008; 27: 809-818
        • Rappange D.R.
        • van Baal P.H.
        • van Exel N.J.
        • et al.
        Unrelated medical costs in life-years gained: should they be included in economic evaluations of healthcare interventions?.
        Pharmacoeconomics. 2008; 26: 815-830
        • Manns B.
        • Meltzer D.
        • Taub K.
        • Donaldson C.
        Illustrating the impact of including future costs in economic evaluations: an application to end-stage renal disease care.
        Health Econ. 2003; 12: 949-958
        • Osoba D.
        • Zee B.
        • Warr D.
        • et al.
        The Quality of Life and Symptom Control Committees of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group.
        Support Care Cancer. 1997; 5: 307-313
        • Shire Pharmaceuticals
        European public assessment report (EPAR) Fosrenol - Summary Product Characteristics (SPC). 2010;
      2. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for bone metabolism and disease in chronic kidney disease.
        Am J Kidney Dis. 2003; 42: S1-S201
        • Rosenberger J.
        • van Dijk J.P.
        • Nagyova I.
        • et al.
        Do dialysis- and transplantation-related medical factors affect perceived health status?.
        Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005; 20: 2153-2158
        • Shmueli A.
        Subjective health status and health values in the general population.
        Med Decis Making. 1999; 19: 122-127
        • Shmueli A.
        The relationship between the visual analog scale and the SF-36 scales in the general population: an update.
        Med Decis Making. 2004; 24: 61-63
        • Briggs A.
        • Claxton K.
        • Sculpher M.
        Decision Modelling for Health Economic Evaluation.
        Oxford University Press, Oxford2006
        • Ouellet G.
        • Cardinal H.
        • Mailhot M.
        • et al.
        Does concomitant administration of sevelamer and calcium carbonate modify the control of phosphatemia?.
        Ther Apher Dial. 2010; 14: 172-177
        • Itoh K.
        • Tanaka M.
        • Hashiguchi J.
        • et al.
        Comparison of sevelamer hydrochloride with colestimide, administered alone or in combination with calcium carbonate, in patients on hemodialysis.
        Ther Apher Dial. 2008; 12: 126-132
        • Manns B.
        • Tonelli M.
        • Shrive F.
        • et al.
        Sevelamer in patients with end-stage renal disease: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Technology report No. 71.
        Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, Ottawa, Ont, Canada2006
        • Herschorn S.
        • Vicente C.
        • Piwko C.
        Canadian cost-effectiveness analysis of solifenacin compared to oxybutynin immediate-release in patients with overactive bladder.
        J Med Econ. 2010; 13: 508-515
        • Hopkins R.B.
        • Tarride J.E.
        • Bowen J.
        • et al.
        Cost-effectiveness of reducing wait times for cataract surgery in Ontario.
        Can J Ophthalmol. 2008; 43: 213-217
        • Kulkarni G.S.
        • Alibhai S.M.
        • Finelli A.
        • et al.
        Cost-effectiveness analysis of immediate radical cystectomy versus intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin therapy for high-risk, high-grade (T1G3) bladder cancer.
        Cancer. 2009; 115: 5450-5459
        • Manns B.J.
        • Hodsman A.
        • Zimmerman D.L.
        • et al.
        Canadian Society of Nephrology commentary on the 2009 KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for the Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Treatment of CKD-Mineral and Bone Disorder (CKD-MBD).
        Am J Kidney Dis. 2010; 55: 800-812
        • Isakova T.
        • Gutierrez O.M.
        • Chang Y.
        • et al.
        Phosphorus binders and survival on hemodialysis.
        J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009; 20: 388-396
        • Chiu Y.W.
        • Teitelbaum I.
        • Misra M.
        • et al.
        Pill burden, adherence, hyperphosphatemia, and quality of life in maintenance dialysis patients.
        Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009; 4: 1089-1096
        • Mehrotra R.
        • Martin K.J.
        • Fishbane S.
        • et al.
        Higher strength lanthanum carbonate provides serum phosphorus control with a low tablet burden and is preferred by patients and physicians: a multicenter study.
        Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008; 3: 1437-1445
        • Tomasello S.
        • Dhupar S.
        • Sherman R.A.
        K/DOQI guidelines, and compliance: the unfortunate reality.
        Dial Transplant. 2004; : 236-240
        • Jamal S.A.
        • Fitchett D.
        • Lok C.E.
        • et al.
        The effects of calcium-based versus non-calcium-based phosphate binders on mortality among patients with chronic kidney disease: a meta-analysis.
        Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009; 24: 3168-3174