Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 32, ISSUE 4, P637-648, April 2010

Evaluation of caspofungin or micafungin as empiric antifungal therapy in adult patients with persistent febrile neutropenia: A retrospective, observational, sequential cohort analysis

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Abstract

      Background: Caspofungin is approved in the United States for empiric antifungal therapy for persistent febrile neutropenia (FN). There are limited data about the use of other echinocandins in this setting.
      Objective: After a formulary change, we retrospectively evaluated the safety and effectiveness of caspofungin and micafungin as empiric antifungal therapy for FN at Brigham and Women's Hospital (Boston, Massachusetts).
      Methods: This was a retrospective, observational, sequential cohort study. We identified patients who had received ≥2 doses on concurrent days of either caspofungin (between November 2005 and October 2006) or micafungin (between November 2006 and October 2007) for empiric FN therapy. Patients were included for analysis if they were neutropenic (absolute neutrophil count <500 cells/μL) and febrile (temperature ≥100.5°F [≥38°C]). Patients without previous exposure to an echinocandin were included; those included in the caspofungin cohort were excluded from the micafungin cohort. Those who had previously received another systemic antifungal agent for FN therapy (except fluconazole for mucosal candidiasis) were excluded. Patients were followed through hospital discharge. Outcomes analyzed were successful treatment of baseline invasive fungal disease (IFD), incidence of breakthrough IFD, overall mortality, and discontinuation because of adverse events (AEs). IFD was diagnosed and classified according to current European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group Consensus Group criteria.
      Results: Three hundred twenty-three patients met inclusion criteria (caspofungin, n = 149; micafungin, n = 174). Median age was 49 years in both the caspofungin and micafungin groups; 80 (53.7%) and 99 (56.9%) patients in each group, respectively, were men. Fluconazole prophylaxis had been administered to 30 patients (20.1%) treated with caspofungin and 21 patients (12.1%) treated with micafungin. Caspofungin was administered at 70 mg for one dose, followed by 50 mg daily; micafungin was administered at 100 mg daily. The median duration of therapy and of hospitalization were 10 days and 29 days, respectively, with caspofungin, and 9 days and 28 days with micafungin (both, P = NS between groups). Twelve patients (8.1%) in the caspofungin cohort and 13 (7.5%) in the micafungin cohort died during the study period (P = NS). There were 3 cases (2.0%) of baseline IFD in the caspofungin cohort and 6 (3.4%) in the micafungin cohort (P = NS); 6 were successfully treated (caspofungin, 2 [1.3% of entire group]; micafungin, 4 [2.37% of entire group]; P = NS). Breakthrough IFD was diagnosed in 16 patients (10.7%) receiving caspofungin and 21 (12.1%) receiving micafungin (P = NS). AEs requiring echinocandin discontinuation were uncommon (caspofungin, 2 cases of rash and 1 anaphylactoid infusion reaction [2.0%]; mica-fungin, 1 liver function test elevation ≥5 times the upper limit of normal and 1 maculopapular rash [1.1%]; P = NS).
      Conclusion: Micafungin, as empiric antifungal therapy for persistent FN, did not appear to differ significantly from caspofungin in terms of safety profile or efficacy in the adult patients included in this sequential cohort analysis at one institution.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Therapeutics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Hughes WT
        • Armstrong D
        • Bodey GP
        • et al.
        2002 Guidelines for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer.
        Clin Infect Dis. 2002; 34: 730-751
        • Vartivarian SE
        • Anaissie EJ
        • Bodey GP
        Emerging fungal pathogens in immunocompromised patients: Classification, diagnosis, and management.
        Clin Infect Dis. 1993; 17: S487-S491
        • Schuler U
        • Bammer S
        • Aulitzky WE
        • et al.
        Safety and efficacy of itraconazole compared to amphotericin B as empirical antifungal therapy for neutropenic fever in patients with haematological malignancy.
        Onkologie. 2007; 30: 185-191
        • Walsh TJ
        • Finberg RW
        • Arndt C
        • et al.
        • for the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group
        Liposomal amphotericin B for empirical therapy in patients with persistent fever and neutropenia.
        N Engl J Med. 1999; 340: 764-771
        • Walsh TJ
        • Pappas P
        • Winston DJ
        • et al.
        • for the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group
        Voriconazole compared with liposomal amphotericin B for empirical antifungal therapy in patients with neutropenia and persistent fever [published correction appears in N Engl J Med. 2007;356:760].
        N Engl J Med. 2002; 346: 225-234
        • Walsh TJ
        • Teppler H
        • Donowitz GR
        • et al.
        Caspofungin versus liposomal amphotericin B for empirical antifungal therapy in patients with persistent fever and neutropenia.
        N Engl J Med. 2004; 351: 1391-1402
        • Wingard JR
        • White MH
        • Anaissie E
        • et al.
        • for the L Amph/ABLC Collaborative Study Group
        A randomized, doubleblind comparative trial evaluating the safety of liposomal amphotericin B versus amphotericin B lipid complex in the empirical treatment of febrile neutropenia. L Amph/ABLC Collaborative Study Group.
        Clin Infect Dis. 2000; 31: 1155-1163
        • Winston DJ
        • Hathorn JW
        • Schuster MG
        • et al.
        A multicenter, randomized trial of fluconazole versus amphotericin B for empiric antifungal therapy of febrile neutropenic patients with cancer.
        Am J Med. 2000; 108: 282-289
        • Dodds Ashley ES
        • Lewis R
        • Lewis JS
        • et al.
        Pharmacology of systemic antifungal agents.
        Clin Infect Dis. 2006; 43: S28-S39
        • Marchetti O
        • Cordonnier C
        • Calandra T
        Empirical antifungal therapy in neutropaenic cancer patients with persistent fever.
        Eur J Cancer Suppl. 2007; 5: 32-42
        • Pfaller MA
        • Boyken L
        • Hollis RJ
        • et al.
        In vitro susceptibility of invasive isolates of Candida spp. to anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin: Six years of global surveillance [published correction appears in J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:3184-3185].
        J Clin Microbiol. 2008; 46: 150-156
      1. Cancidas (caspofungin acetate) [prescribing information].March 30, 2010 (Accessed)
        • Seibel NL
        • Schwartz C
        • Arrieta A
        • et al.
        Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of Micafungin (FK463) in febrile neutropenic pediatric patients.
        Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005; 49: 3317-3324
        • Toubai T
        • Tanaka J
        • Ota S
        • et al.
        Efficacy and safety of micafungin in febrile neutropenic patients treated for hematological malignancies.
        Intern Med. 2007; 46: 3-9
        • Yanada M
        • Kiyoi H
        • Murata M
        • et al.
        Micafungin, a novel antifungal agent, as empirical therapy in acute leukemia patients with febrile neutropenia.
        Intern Med. 2006; 45: 259-264
        • Kuse ER
        • Chetchotisakd P
        • da Cunha CA
        • et al.
        • for the Micafungin Invasive Candidiasis Working Group
        Micafungin versus liposomal amphotericin B for candidaemia and invasive candidosis: A phase III randomised double-blind trial.
        Lancet. 2007; 369: 1519-1527
        • Pappas PG
        • Rotstein CM
        • Betts RF
        • et al.
        Micafungin versus caspofungin for treatment of candidemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis [published correction appears in Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47:302].
        Clin Infect Dis. 2007; 45: 883-893
        • Lewis JS
        • Jorgensen JH
        • Patterson JE
        Clinical and financial impact of adoption of micafungin as the preferred echinocandin in a university teaching hospital.
        Presented at: 44th Annual Meeting of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2006 (Toronto, Canada. Abstract 573)
        • Dellit TH
        • Owens RC
        • McGowan Jr, JE
        • et al.
        • for the Infectious Diseases Society of America
        • Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America
        Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America guidelines for developing an institutional program to enhance antimicrobial stewardship.
        Clin Infect Dis. 2007; 44: 159-177
        • de Pauw BE
        • Sable CA
        • Walsh TJ
        • et al.
        Impact of alternate definitions of fever resolution on the composite endpoint in clinical trials of empirical antifungal therapy for neutropenic patients with persistent fever: Analysis of results from the Caspofungin Empirical Therapy Study.
        Transpl Infect Dis. 2006; 8: 31-37
        • De Pauw B
        • Walsh TJ
        • Donnelly JP
        • et al.
        • for the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group
        • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group
        Revised definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group.
        Clin Infect Dis. 2008; 46: 1813-1821
        • Rothman KJ
        • Greenland S
        • Lash TL
        Modern Epidemiology. 3rd ed. Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, Pa2008
        • Sucher AJ
        • Chahine EB
        • Balcer HE
        Echinocandins: The newest class of antifungals.
        Ann Pharmacother. 2009; 43: 1647-1657
        • Ascioglu S
        • Rex JH
        • de Pauw B
        • et al.
        • for the Invasive Funcal Infections Cooperative Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer
        • Mycoses Study Group of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
        Defining opportunistic invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised patients with cancer and hematopoietic stem cell transplants: An international consensus.
        Clin Infect Dis. 2002; 34: 7-14
        • Heresi GP
        • Gerstmann DR
        • Reed MD
        • et al.
        The pharmacokinetics and safety of micafungin, a novel echinocandin, in premature infants.
        Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2006; 25: 1110-1115
        • Walsh TJ
        • Adamson PC
        • Seibel NL
        • et al.
        Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of caspofungin in children and adolescents.
        Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005; 49: 4536-4545