Advertisement
Rapid Communication| Volume 31, ISSUE 9, P1977-1986, September 2009

Tolerability of teicoplanin in 117 hospitalized adults with previous vancomycin-induced fever, rash, or neutropenia: A retrospective chart review

  • Yuan-Pin Hung
    Affiliations
    Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan

    Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Health Research Institutes, Tainan, Taiwan

    Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Dou-Liou Branch, Yunlin, Taiwan
    Search for articles by this author
  • Nan-Yao Lee
    Affiliations
    Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan

    Center for Infection Control, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan
    Search for articles by this author
  • Chia-Ming Chang
    Affiliations
    Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan

    Center for Infection Control, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan
    Search for articles by this author
  • Hsin-Chun Lee
    Affiliations
    Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan

    Center for Infection Control, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan

    Medical College, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
    Search for articles by this author
  • Chi-Jung Wu
    Affiliations
    Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan

    Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Health Research Institutes, Tainan, Taiwan

    Center for Infection Control, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan
    Search for articles by this author
  • Po-Lin Chen
    Affiliations
    Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan
    Search for articles by this author
  • Ching-Chi Lee
    Affiliations
    Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Health Research Institutes, Tainan, Taiwan

    Department of Emergency Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan
    Search for articles by this author
  • Chih-Huan Chung
    Affiliations
    Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan
    Search for articles by this author
  • Wen-Chien Ko
    Correspondence
    Address correspondence to: Wen-Chien Ko, MD, Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, No. 138 Sheng Li Road, Tainan, 70403, Taiwan
    Affiliations
    Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan

    Center for Infection Control, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan

    Medical College, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan

    Division of Clinical Research, National Health Research Institutes, Tainan, Taiwan
    Search for articles by this author
      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Abstract

      Background: Vancomycin has reliable antibacterial activity against many gram-positive pathogens but is associated with many adverse events. Teicoplanin, another glycopeptide, is associated with fewer adverse events, but its use in patients with previous vancomycininduced adverse reactions remains controversial.
      Objectives: The aims of this work were to evaluate the clinical characteristics of hospitalized patients with vancomycin-induced fever (ie, drug fever), rash, or neutropenia and to examine the tolerability of teicoplanin in these patients.
      Methods: This was a retrospective review of the medical charts of patients aged ≥18 years who were hospitalized between January 2002 and October 2007 at National Cheng Kung University Hospital in Tainan, Taiwan. Patients were included if they experienced drug-induced fever (ie, “drug fever”), rash, or neutropenia during vancomycin treatment. Their antimicrobial therapy was subsequently switched to teicoplanin. Clinical information and the development of drug fever, rash, or neutropenia with teicoplanin were determined from the charts.
      Results: Antibiotic therapy was switched to teicoplanin in 117 patients with vancomycin-induced fever alone (n = 24), rash alone (n = 77), both drug fever and rash (n = 8), or neutropenia (n = 8). The mean (SD) age of these patients was 53.1 (22.8) years, and 65 (56%) were male. The major clinical indications for vancomycin therapy among these patients were wound infections (21%), respiratory tract infections (14%), and bacteremia (13%). The dosages for vancomycin ranged from 1 g every 5 days to 1 g BID, and for teicoplanin ranged from 400 mg daily to 400 mg q72h, adjusted by the degree of renal dysfunction. Overall, 12 patients with vancomycin-induced fever (n = 2), rash (n = 6), or neutropenia (n = 4) subsequently developed teicoplanin-induced fever (n = 3), rash (n = 3), or neutropenia (n = 6). Specifically, of 8 patients with vancomycin-induced neutropenia, 4 (50%) subsequently developed neutropenia after switching to teicoplanin. Vancomycin- and teicoplanininduced neutropenia was often noted after 1 week of treatment. Among patients with vancomycin-induced fever, rash, or neutropenia, there were no differences between patients with or without teicoplanin-induced fever, rash, or neutropenia in terms of age, sex, weight, dosage or duration of vancomycin therapy, dosage of teicoplanin, or underlying disease. There was no difference in mortality rates between patients with or without teicoplanin-induced fever, rash, or neutropenia. The cause of all deaths was progression of infectious or underlying disease, unrelated to vancomycin or teicoplanin use.
      Conclusions: Based on this retrospective chart review of hospitalized patients with vancomycin-induced fever, rash, or neutropenia, only 10% experienced subsequent teicoplanin-induced fever, rash, or neutropenia. However, it should be noted that half of the patients with vancomycin-induced neutropenia developed teicoplanin-induced neutropenia.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Therapeutics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Corey GR
        Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections: Definitions and treatment.
        Clin Infect Dis. 2009; 48: S254-S259
        • Kirby WM
        Vancomycin therapy of severe staphylococcal infections.
        J Antimicrob Chemother. 1984; 14: 73-78
        • Gruchalla RS
        • Pirmohamed M
        Clinical practice. Antibiotic allergy.
        N Engl J Med. 2006; 354: 601-609
        • Wood MJ
        The comparative efficacy and safety of teicoplanin and vancomycin [published corrections appear in J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996;38:919 and J Antimicrob Chemother. 1997;40:147].
        J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996; 37: 209-222
        • Hsu SI
        Biopsy-proved acute tubulointerstitial nephritis and toxic epidermal necrolysis associated with vancomycin.
        Pharmacotherapy. 2001; 21: 1233-1239
        • Hannah BA
        • Kimmel PL
        • Dosa S
        • Turner ML
        Vancomycininduced toxic epidermal necrolysis.
        South Med J. 1990; 83: 720-722
        • Perrett CM
        • McBride SR
        Teicoplanin induced drug hypersensitivity syndrome.
        BMJ. 2004; 328: 1292
        • Kwon HS
        • Chang YS
        • Jeong YY
        • et al.
        A case of hypersensitivity syndrome to both vancomycin and teicoplanin.
        J Korean Med Sci. 2006; 21: 1108-1110
        • Grek V
        • Andrien F
        • Collignon J
        • Fillet G
        Allergic crossreaction of teicoplanin and vancomycin.
        J Antimicrob Chemother. 1991; 28: 476-477
        • Davey PG
        • Williams AH
        A review of the safety profile of teicoplanin.
        J Antimicrob Chemother. 1991; 27: 69-73
        • Schlemmer B
        • Falkman H
        • Boudjadja A
        • et al.
        Teicoplanin for patients allergic to vancomycin.
        N Engl J Med. 1988; 318: 1127-1128
        • McElrath MJ
        • Goldberg D
        • Neu HC
        Allergic cross-reactivity of teicoplanin and vancomycin.
        Lancet. 1986; 1: 47
        • Hsiao SH
        • Chang CM
        • Tsai JC
        • et al.
        Glycopeptideinduced neutropenia: Cross-reactivity between vancomycin and teicoplanin.
        Ann Pharmacother. 2007; 41: 891-894
        • Khurana C
        • de Belder MA
        Red-man syndrome after vancomycin: Potential cross-reactivity with teicoplanin.
        Postgrad Med J. 1999; 75: 41-43
        • Marshall C
        • Street A
        • Galbraith K
        Glycopeptide-induced vasculitis-cross-reactivity between vancomycin and teicoplanin.
        J Infect. 1998; 37: 82-83
        • Prey S
        • Sparsa A
        • Boumediene A
        • et al.
        Cutaneous drug reactions induced by glycopeptides [in French].
        Med Mal Infect. 2007; 37: 270-274
        • Naranjo CA
        • Busto U
        • Sellers EM
        • et al.
        A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions.
        Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1981; 30: 239-245
        • Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program
        Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0 (CTCAE).
        (Accessed January 24, 2009)
        • Levey AS
        • Eckardt KU
        • Tsukamoto Y
        • et al.
        Definition and classification of chronic kidney disease: A position statement from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO).
        Kidney Int. 2005; 67: 2089-2100
        • Farber BF
        • Moellering Jr, RC
        Retrospective study of the toxicity of preparations of vancomycin from 1974 to 1981.
        Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983; 23: 138-141
        • Morris A
        • Ward C
        High incidence of vancomycin-associated leucopenia and neutropenia in a cardiothoracic surgical unit.
        J Infect. 1991; 22: 217-223
        • Pai MP
        • Mercier RC
        • Koster SA
        Epidemiology of vancomycin-induced neutropenia in patients receiving home intravenous infusion therapy.
        Ann Pharmacother. 2006; 40: 224-228
        • Segarra-Newnham M
        • Tagoff SS
        Probable vancomycininduced neutropenia.
        Ann Pharmacother. 2004; 38: 1855-1859
        • LeFrock J
        • Ristuccia A
        Teicoplanin in the treatment of bone and joint infections: An open study.
        J Infect Chemother. 1999; 5: 32-39
        • Pauluzzi S
        • Del Favero A
        • Menichetti F
        • et al.
        Treatment of infections by staphylococci and other gram-positive bacteria with teicoplanin: An open study.
        J Antimicrob Chemother. 1987; 20: 431-438
        • Calain P
        • Krause KH
        • Vaudaux P
        • et al.
        Early termination of a prospective, randomized trial comparing teicoplanin and flucloxacillin for treating severe staphylococcal infections.
        J Infect Dis. 1987; 155: 187-191
        • Sanche SE
        • Dust WN
        • Shevchuk YM
        Vancomycin-induced neutropenia resolves after substitution with teicoplnin.
        Clin Infect Dis. 2000; 31: 824-825
        • Asero R
        Teicoplanin-induced anaphylaxis.
        Allergy. 2006; 61: 1370
        • Smith PF
        • Taylor CT
        Vancomycininduced neutropenia associated with fever: Similarities between two immune-mediated drug reactions.
        Pharmacotherapy. 1999; 19: 240-244
        • Schwartz MD
        Vancomycin-induced neutropenia in a patient positive for an antineutrophil antibody.
        Pharmacotherapy. 2002; 22: 783-788
        • Rocha JL
        • Kondo W
        • Baptista MI
        • et al.
        Uncommon vancomycin-induced side effects.
        Braz J Infect Dis. 2002; 6: 196-200