Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 31, ISSUE 2, P411-417, February 2009

Download started.

Ok

Bioequivalence of single 100-mg doses of two oral formulations of topiramate: An open-label, randomized-sequence, two-period crossover study in healthy adult male Mexican volunteers

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Abstract

      Background: The proprietary form of topiramate is indicated in Mexico as an antiepileptic agent and in the prophylaxis of migraine headaches. However, before generic topiramate is placed on the market, pharmacokinetic studies investigating the bioequivalence of generic and branded formulations are needed.
      Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the bioequivalence and tolerability of a generic (test) and a branded (reference) formulation of topiramate 100 mg in healthy Mexican volunteers.
      Methods: This open-label, randomized-sequence, 2-period crossover study was conducted at Ipharma SA de CV, Monterrey, Mexico. Eligible subjects were healthy male Mexican volunteers aged 18 to 45 years. Participants were randomly assigned to receive 100 mg of the test or reference formulation, followed by a 3-week washout period and administration of the alternate formulation. Doses were administered after a 12-hour overnight fast. For analysis of pharmacokinetic properties, including Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞, blood samples were obtained over a 144-hour period after dosing. The formulations were to be considered bioequivalent if calculations of a 90% CI for the ratio of the means of the measures for the test and reference formulations fell within bioequivalence limits, 80% to 125%, for logarithmic (log) transformation of Cmax and AUC, and if two 1-sided t tests showed P < 0.05. Tolerability was assessed using vital sign measurement (blood pressure, body temperature, heart rate, and respiratory rate), laboratory analysis (hematology, blood biochemistry, hepatic function, and urinalysis), and subject interview.
      Results: Twenty-eight men (mean age, 22.21 years [range, 18–28 years]; mean weight, 75.04 kg [range, 62–96 kg]; mean height, 177 cm [range, 163–192 cm]) were enrolled in this study, and 28 (14 each randomized to receive the test or reference formulation first) completed it. No period or sequence effects were observed. The 90% CIs for the log-transformed Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ were 94.70 to 112.05, 98.88 to 105.16, and 98.80 to 105.28, respectively (all, P < 0.05). No adverse events were reported by the volunteers or found on clinical laboratory testing during the study.
      Conclusions: This study did not find any statistically significant differences in Cmax or AUC values between the test and reference formulations of oral topiramate 100 mg in this population of healthy adult male Mexican volunteers. On that basis, and according to both the rate and extent of absorption, the test and reference formulations met the regulatory criteria for bioequivalence. Both formulations were well tolerated.

      Key words:

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Therapeutics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. Epilepsies.
        in: Brunton LL Lazo JS Parker KL Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 11th ed. McGraw-Hill Medical Publishing Division, New York, NY2006: 507-520
      2. Topiramate [prescribing information] [Clinical Pharmacology Web site].

      3. http://www.clinicalpharmacology.com
        Date: September 19, 2007
        (Accessed)
        • Coulter DA
        • Sombati S
        • DeLorenzo RJ
        Selective effects of topiramate on sustained repetitive firing and spontaneous bursting in cultured hippocampal neurons.
        Epilepsia. 1993; 34: 123
        • Brown SD
        • Wolf HH
        • Swinyard EA
        • et al.
        The novel anticonvulsant topiramate enhances GABA-mediated chloride flux.
        Epilepsia. 1993; 34: 122-123
        • Severt L
        • Coulter DA
        • Sombati S
        • et al.
        Topiramate selectively blocks kainate currents in cultured hippocampal neurons.
        Epilepsia. 1995; 36: S38-S39
      4. Topiramate.
        in: Hardman JG Limbird LE Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 11th ed. McGraw-Hill Medical Publishing Division, New York, NY2005: 1879
        • Doose DR
        • Walker SA
        • Gisclon LG
        • Nayak RK
        Single-dose pharmacokinetics and effect of food on the bioavailability of topiramate, a novel antiepileptic drug.
        J Clin Pharmacol. 1996; 36: 884-891
      5. The World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects [WMA Web site].

      6. http://www.wma.net/e/policy/b3.htm
        Date: September 19, 2007
        (Accessed)
      7. Ministry of Health of Mexico. Official Mexican standard NOM-177-SSA1-1998 which establishes proofs and procedures for demonstrating that a medication is interchangeable [in Spanish] [MHM Web site].

      8. (Accessed)
        • Contin M
        • Riva R
        • Albani F
        • Baruzzi A
        Simple and rapid liquid chromatographic-turbo ion spray mass spectrometric determination of topiramate in human plasma.
        J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl. 2001; 761: 133-137
      9. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry. Bioanalytical Method Validation [CDER Web site].

      10. (Accessed)
        • US Food and Drug Administration
        In vivo bioequivalence guidances.
        Pharmacopeial Forum. 1993; 19: 6501-6508
        • Schuirmann DJ
        A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability.
        J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1987; 15: 657-680
      11. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry: Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies for Orally Administered Drug Products—General Considerations [CDER Web site].

      12. (Accessed)
      13. Statistical methods for average bioavailability and bioequivalence studies.
        in: Chow S-C Liu J-P Design and Analysis of Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies. 2nd ed. Marcel Dekker, New York, NY2000: 79-124 (revised and expanded)
      14. Power and sample size determination.
        in: Chow S-C Liu J-P Design and Analysis of Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies. 2nd ed. Marcel Dekker, New York, NY2000: 125-160 (revised and expanded)