Advertisement
Clinical Therapeutics
Advanced searchSave search
Research Article| Volume 29, ISSUE 5, P918-926, May 2007

Paroxetine and congenital malformations: Meta-Analysis and consideration of potential confounding factors

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.05.003
Paroxetine and congenital malformations: Meta-Analysis and consideration of potential confounding factors
Previous ArticleProspective evaluation of patient-reported outcomes during treatment with deferasirox or deferoxamine for iron overload in patients with β-thalassemia
Next ArticleComparison of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of biphasic insulin aspart 50 and 30 in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A single-center, randomized, double-blind, two-period, crossover trial in Japan
      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Abstract

      Background:

      Antidepressants have been commonly used by women of childbearing age. Recent studies suggest that paroxetine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), might specifically increase teratogenic risk.

      Objectives:

      The purpose of this study was to quantify first-trimester exposure to paroxetine and birth defects and examine potential sources of bias in the in utero or postnatal detection of more congenital malformations among women with depression. We also sought to examine whether paroxetine was used for the same indications as other SSRIs among pregnant women.

      Methods:

      This meta-analysis was designed to quantify malformation rates associated with the use of paroxetine. A search of the literature from 1985 to 2006 (English language) found in MEDLINE, EMBASE, REPROTOX, Scopus, and Biological Abstracts was conducted using the following terms: pregnancy outcome, congenital or fetal AND anomalies, malformations, cardiac/heart defects, AND selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, paroxetine, and Paxil. Administrative databases of medication and medical services use in the Province of Quebec, Canada, were used to calculate the rates of ultrasound and echocardiogram in pregnancy and infancy in women/infants exposed to SSRIs and to compare the indications for general SSRI use versus paroxetine use.

      Results:

      Based on the studies analyzed, first-trimester paroxetine exposure was associated with a significant increase in the risk for cardiac malformation (odds ratio [OR], 1.72; 95% CI, 1.22-2.42). Women using antidepressants in pregnancy had a 30% higher rate of utilization of ultrasound in pregnancy. Infants of women who received SSRIs underwent approximately twice as many echocardiograms in the first year of life compared with children of women who used nothing. Significantly more women receiving paroxetine used the drug for anxiety or panic than women receiving other SSRIs (OR, 4.11; 95% CI, 2.39–7.08).

      Conclusions:

      Based on the results of this metaanalysis, first-trimester exposure to paroxetine appears to be associated with a significant increase in the risk for cardiac malformation. However, a detection bias cannot be ruled out as contributing to the apparent increased detection of cardiovascular malformation of children exposed in utero to paroxetine. A significantly greater number of women were using paroxetine for anxiety or panic when compared with women using other SSRIs.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Therapeutics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Register: Create an account
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Koren G.
        • Pastuszak A.
        • Ito S.
        Drugs in pregnancy.
        N Engl J Med. 1998; 338: 1128-1137
        • Einarson A.
        • Koren G.
        A survey of women's attitudes concerning healthy lifestyle changes prior to pregnancy.
        JFAS Int. 2006; 4: e2
        • Marcus S.M.
        • Flynn H.A.
        • Blow F.C.
        • Barry K.L.
        Depressive symptoms among pregnant women screened in obstetrics settings.
        J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2003; 12: 373-380
        • Hallberg P.
        • Sjoblom V.
        The use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors during pregnancy and breast-feeding: A review and clinical aspects.
        J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2005; 25: 59-73
        • Einarson T.R.
        • Einarson A.
        Newer antidepressants in pregnancy and rates of major malformations: A meta-analysis of prospective comparative studies.
        Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2005; 14: 823-827
        • Rahimi R.
        • Nikfar S.
        • Abdollahi M.
        Pregnancy outcomes following exposure to serotonin reuptake inhibitors: A metaanalysis of clinical trials.
        Reprod Toxicol. 2006; 22: 571-575
        • Kulin N.A.
        • Pastuszak A.
        • Sage S,R.
        • et al.
        Pregnancy outcome following maternal use of the new selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: A prospective controlled multicenter study.
        JAMA. 1998; 279: 609-610
        • Schloemp S.
        • Paulus W.E.
        • Sterzik K.
        • Stoz F.
        Congenital malformations after antidepressant medication with Paroxetine in early pregnancy?.
        Hum Reprod. 2006; 21 (ESHRE abstract 0-030): i12
        • Malm H.
        • Klaukka T.
        • Neuvonen P.J.
        Risks associated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in pregnancy.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 106: 1289-1296
        • Diav-Citrin O.
        • Shechtman S.
        • Weinbaum D.
        • et al.
        Paroxetine and fluoxetine in pregnancy: A multicenter, prospective controlled study.
        Reprod Toxicol. 2005; 20 (Abstract): 459
      11. (Available at:)
        • GlaxoSmithKline Medicine
        Updated preliminary report on bupropion and other antidepressants, including Paroxetine, in pregnancy and the occurrence of cardiovascular and major congenital malformation [Clinical Trial Register Web site].
        (Accessed)
        http://www.gsk.com/media/paroxetine_pregnancy.htm
        (April 20, 2007)
        • Cole J.A.
        • Ng E.W.
        • Ephross S.A.
        • et al.
        Paroxetine in the first trimester of pregnancy and the prevalence of congenital malformations.
        Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2006; 15 (Abstract): S6
        • Kallen B.
        • Otterblad Olausson P.
        Antidepressant drugs during pregnancy and infant congenital heart defect.
        Reprod Toxicol. 2006; 21 (Letter): 221-222
      14. SSRI antidepressants and birth defects.
        Prescrire Int. 2006; 15: 222-223
      15. US Food and Drug Administration. FDA Public Health Advisory, Paroxetine, 2007
        http://www.fda.gov/cder/drug/advisory/paroxetine_200512.htm
        (April 20)
        • Canadian Pharmaceutical Association
        Compendium of Pharmaceuticals and Specialties (Canada). Volume 47. Canadian Pharmaceutical Association, Toronto, Canada2007
        • Begg C.B.
        • Mazumdar M.
        Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias.
        Biometrics. 1994; 50: 1088-1101
        • Downs S.H.
        • Black N.
        The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological qual ity both of randomised and nonrandomised studies of health care interventions.
        J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998; 52: 377-384
        • Tamblyn R.
        • Lavoie G.
        • Petrella L.
        • Monette J.
        The use of prescription claims databases in pharmacoepi demiological research: The accuracy and comprehensiveness of the prescription claims database in Quebec.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 1995; 48: 999-1009
        • Levy A.R.
        • Mayo N.E.
        • Grimard G.
        Rates of transcervical and pertrochanteric hip fractures in the province of Quebec, Canada, 1981–1992.
        Am J Epidemiol. 1995; 142: 428-436
        • Lacasse A.M.
        • Rey E.
        • Ferreira E.
        • et al.
        Nausea and vomiting of pregnancy: Are there multiethnic differences in the reporting and management?.
        Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2005; 14 (Abstract): 5203
        • Roy E.
        • Haley N.
        • Leclerc P.
        • et al.
        Mortality in a cohort of street youth in Montreal.
        JAMA. 2004; 292: 569-574
      23. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM). Online ICD9/ICD9CM codes Web site.
        http://www.icd9cm.chrisendres.com/2007/
        (April 15, 2007)
        • Sarkar M.
        • Woodland C.C.
        • Koren G.
        • Einarson A.R.
        Pregnancy outcome following gestational exposure to azithromycin.
        BMC Pregnancy Child birth. 2006; 6: 18
        • Gentile S.
        The safety of newer antidepressants in pregnancy and breastfeeding.
        DrugSaf. 2005; 28: 137-152
        • Bianca S.
        • Bianca M.
        • Ingegnosi C.
        • et al.
        Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and pregnancy outcome.
        Reprod Toxicol. 2005; 20: 454-455
        • Wogelius P.
        • Norgaard M.
        • Muff Munk E.
        • et al.
        Maternal use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and risk of adverse pregnancy outcome.
        Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2005; 14 (Abstract): S72-S73
        • Alwan S.
        • Reefhuis J.
        • Rasmussen S.
        • et al.
        Maternal use of selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors and risk for birth defects.
        Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2005; 73 (Abstract): 291
        • Ericson A.
        • Kallen B.
        • Wiholm B.
        Delivery outcome after the use of antidepressants in early pregnancy.
        Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1999; 55: 503-508
        • Hendrick V.
        • Smith L.M.
        • Suri R.
        • et al.
        Birth outcomes after prenatal exposure to antidepressant medication.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 188: 812-815
        • Simon G.E.
        • Cunningham M.L.
        • Davis R.L.
        Outcomes of prenatal antide pressant exposure.
        Am J Psychiatry. 2002; 159: 2055-2061
        • Wen S.W.
        • Walker M.
        The use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in pregnancy.
        J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2004; 26: 819-822
        • Berard A.
        • Ramos E.
        • Oraichi D.
        • et al.
        Gestational exposure to paroxetine and cardiac malformations in in fants: A nested case-control study.
        Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2006; 76 (Abstract): 335
        • Cohen L.S.
        • Altshuler L.L.
        • Harlow B.L,
        • et al.
        Relapse of major depression during pregnancy in women who maintain or discontinue antidepressant treatment.
        JAMA. 2006; 295 ([published correction appears in JAMA. 2006;296:170]): 499-507
        • Minkovitz C.S.
        • Strobino D.
        • Scharfstein D.
        • et al.
        Maternal depressive symptoms and children's receipt of health care in the first 3 years of life.
        Pediatrics. 2005; 115: 306-314
        • Williams P.R.
        • Argent E.H.
        • Chalmers C.
        A study of an urban health centre: Factors influencing contact with mothers and their babies.
        Child Care Health Dev. 1981; 7: 255-266
        • Baspinar O.
        • Karaaslan S.
        • Oran B.
        • et al.
        Prevalence and distribution of children with congenital heart diseases in the central Anatolian region, Turkey.
        Turk J Pediatr. 2006; 48: 237-243
        • Rickels K.
        • Rynn M.
        • Iyengar M.
        • Duff D.
        Remission of generalized anxiety disorder: A review of the paroxetine clinical trials database.
        J Clin Psychiatry. 2006; 67: 41-47
        • Goldman S.L.
        • Owen M.T.
        The impact of parental trait anxiety on the utilization of health care services in in fancy: A prospective study.
        J Pediatr Psychol. 1994; 19: 369-381

      Article info

      Publication history

      Accepted: March 9, 2007

      Identification

      DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.05.003

      Copyright

      © 2007 Excerpta Medica, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      ScienceDirect

      Access this article on ScienceDirect

      The content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals.


      We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. To update your cookie settings, please visit the Cookie Preference Center for this site.
      Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. except certain content provided by third parties.


      RELX