Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 24, ISSUE 3, P378-396, March 2002

Effects of Pioglitazone and rosiglitazone on blood lipid levels and glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A retrospective review of randomly selected medical records

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Abstract

      Background: The antihyperglycemic effects of pioglitazone hydrochloride and rosiglitazone maleate are well documented. The results of clinical trials and observational studies have suggested, however, that there are individual differences in the effects of these drugs on blood lipid levels.
      Objective: The present study evaluated the effects of pioglitazone and rosiglitazone on blood lipid levels and glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
      Methods: This was a retrospective review of randomly selected medical records from 605 primary care practices in the United States in which adults with type 2 diabetes received pioglitazone or rosiglitazone between August 1, 1999, and August 31, 2000. The outcome measures were mean changes in serum concentrations of triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) values.
      Results: Treatment with pioglitazone was associated with a reduction in mean TG of 55.17 mg/dL, a reduction in TC of 8.45 mg/dL, an increase in HDL-C of 2.65 mg/dL, and a reduction in LDL-C of 5.05 mg/dL. Treatment with rosiglitazone was associated with a reduction in mean TG of 13.34 mg/dL, an increase in TC of 4.81 mg/dL, a reduction in HDL-C of 0.12 mg/dL, and an increase in LDL-C of 3.56 mg/dL. With the exception of HDL-C, the differences in mean changes in lipid parameters between treatment groups were statistically significantly (P < 0.001, pioglitazone vs rosiglitazone). Reductions in HbA1c were statistically equivalent between treatments (1.04% pioglitazone, 1.18% rosiglitazone).
      Conclusions: Treatment with pioglitazone was associated with greater beneficial effects on blood lipid levels than treatment with rosiglitazone, whereas glycemic control was equivalent between the 2 treatments.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Therapeutics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Parulkar AA
        • Pendergrass ML
        • Granda-Ayala R
        • et al.
        Nonhypoglycemic effects of thiazolidinediones.
        Ann Intern Med. 2001; 134: 61-71
        • Schoonjans K
        • Auwerx J
        Thiazolidine-diones: An update.
        Lancet. 2000; 355: 1008-1010
        • Olefsky JM
        Treatment of insulin resistance with peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonists.
        J Clin Invest. 2000; 106: 467-472
        • Vamecq J
        • Latruffe N
        Medical significance of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors.
        Lancet. 1999; 354: 141-148
        • Watkins PB
        • Whitcomb RW
        Hepatic dysfunction associated with troglitazone.
        N Engl J Med. 1998; 338 (Letter): 916-917
        • Shibuya A
        • Watanabe M
        • Fujita Y
        • et al.
        An autopsy case of troglitazone-induced fulminant hepatitis.
        Diabetes Care. 1998; 21: 2140-2143
        • Gitlin N
        • Julie NL
        • Spurr CL
        • et al.
        Two cases of severe clinical and histologic hepatotoxicity associated with troglitazone.
        Ann Intern Med. 1998; 129: 36-38
      1. Actos™ (pioglitazone hydrochloride) tablets. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc, Lincolnshire, Ill1999 ([package insert])
        • Glazer NB
        • Cheatham WW
        Thiazolidinediones for type 2 diabetes. No evidence exists that pioglitazone induces hepatic cytochrome P450 isoform CYP3A4.
        Br Med J. 2001; 322 (Letter): 235-236
        • Maeda K
        Hepatocellular injury in a patient receiving pioglitazone.
        Ann Intern Med. 2001; 135 (Letter): 306
      2. Avandia® (rosiglitazone maleate) tablets. GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC2001 ([package insert])
        • Al-Salman J
        • Arjomand H
        • Kemp DG
        • Mittal M
        Hepatocellular injury in a patient receiving rosiglitazone. A case report.
        Ann Intern Med. 2000; 132: 121-124
        • Forman LM
        • Simmons DA
        • Diamond RH
        Hepatic failure in a patient taking rosiglitazone.
        Ann Intern Med. 2000; 132: 118-121
        • Freid J
        • Everitt D
        • Boscia J
        Rosiglitazone and hepatic failure.
        Ann Intern Med. 2000; 132 (Letter): 164
        • Isley WL
        • Oki JC
        Rosiglitazone and liver failure.
        Ann Intern Med. 2000; 133 (Letter): 393-394
        • Ravinuthala RS
        • Nori U
        Rosiglitazone toxicity.
        Ann Intern Med. 2000; 133 (Letter): 658
        • Rosenblatt S
        • Miskin B
        • Glazer NB
        • et al.
        The impact of pioglitazone on glycemic control and atherogenic dyslipidemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
        Coron Artery Dis. 2001; 12: 413-423
        • Kipnes MS
        • Krosnick A
        • Rendell MS
        • et al.
        Pioglitazone hydrochloride in combination with sulfonylurea therapy improves glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A randomized, placebo-controlled study.
        Am J Med. 2001; 111: 10-17
        • Aronoff S
        • Rosenblatt S
        • Braithwaite S
        • et al.
        • Pioglitazone 001 Study Group
        Pioglitazone hydrochloride monotherapy improves glycemic control in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes: A 6-month randomized placebo-controlled dose-response study.
        Diabetes Care. 2000; 23: 1605-1611
        • Lebovitz HE
        • Dole JF
        • Patwardhan R
        • et al.
        Rosiglitazone monotherapy is effective in patients with type 2 diabetes.
        J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001; 86: 280-288
        • Patel J
        • Anderson RJ
        • Rappaport EB
        Rosiglitazone monotherapy improves glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: A twelve-week, randomized, placebo-controlled study.
        Diabetes Obes Metab. 1999; 1: 165-172
        • Phillips LS
        • Grunberger G
        • Miller E
        • et al.
        Once- and twice-daily dosing with rosiglitazone improves glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes.
        Diabetes Care. 2001; 24: 308-315
        • Fonseca V
        • Rosenstock J
        • Patwardhan R
        • Salzman A
        Effect of metformin and rosiglitazone combination therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A randomized controlled trial.
        JAMA. 2000; 283: 1695-1702
        • Nolan JJ
        • Jones NP
        • Patwardhan R
        • Deacon LF
        Rosiglitazone taken once daily provides effective glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
        Diabet Med. 2000; 17: 287-294
        • Raskin P
        • Rappaport EB
        • Cole ST
        • et al.
        Rosiglitazone short-term monotherapy lowers fasting and post-prandial glucose in patients with type II diabetes.
        Diabetologia. 2000; 43: 278-284
        • Wolffenbuttel BH
        • Gomis R
        • Squatrito S
        • et al.
        Addition of low-dose rosiglitazone to sulphonylurea therapy improves glycaemic control in type 2 diabetic patients.
        Diabet Med. 2000; 17: 40-47
        • Raskin P
        • Rendell M
        • Riddle MC
        • et al.
        A randomized trial of rosiglitazone therapy in patients with inadequately controlled insulin-treated type 2 diabetes.
        Diabetes Care. 2001; 24: 1226-1232
        • Einhorn D
        • Rendell M
        • Rosenzweig J
        • et al.
        • Pioglitazone 027 Study Group
        Pioglitazone hydrochloride in combination with metformin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: A randomized, placebo-controlled study.
        Clin Ther. 2000; 22: 1395-1409
        • Miyazaki Y
        • Mahankali A
        • Matsuda M
        • et al.
        Improved glycemic control and enhanced insulin sensitivity in type 2 diabetic subjects treated with pioglitazone.
        Diabetes Care. 2001; 24: 710-719
        • King AB
        • Armstrong D
        Comparison of the glucose and lipid effects of rosiglitazone (ROS) and pioglitazone (PIO) following conversion from troglitazone (TRO) treatment.
        Diabetes. 2001; 50 (Abstract): A120-A121
        • King AB
        A comparison in a clinical setting of the efficacy and side effects of three thiazolidinediones.
        Diabetes Care. 2000; 23 (Letter): 557
        • Khan MA
        • St. Peter JV
        • Neafus KL
        • et al.
        A prospective, randomized comparison of the metabolic effects of pioglitazone vs rosiglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes who were previously treated with troglitazone.
        Diabetes. 2001; 50 (Abstract): A119
        • Gegick CG
        • Altheimer MD
        Comparison of effects of thiazolidinediones on cardiovascular risk factors: Observations from a clinical practice.
        Endocr Pract. 2001; 7: 162-169
        • Zar JH
        3rd ed. Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ1996
        • Wilson PWF
        • D'Agostino RB
        • Levy D
        • et al.
        Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories.
        Circulation. 1998; 97: 1837-1847
      3. National Diabetes Fact Sheet: National Estimates and General Information on Diabetes in the United States. US Dept of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga1998 (Revised)
      4. The impact of diabetes. American Diabetes Association Web site. Available at: http://www.diabetes.org/main/application/commercewf?origin=*.jsp&event=link(B1_1). Accessed July 27, 2001.

        • Turner RC
        • Millns H
        • Neil HA
        • et al.
        Risk factors for coronary artery disease in non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus: United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS: 23).
        Br Med J. 1998; 316: 823-828
      5. Executive Summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III).
        JAMA. 2001; 285: 2486-2497
        • Stratton IM
        • Adler AI
        • Neil HA
        • et al.
        Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): Prospective observational study.
        Br Med J. 2000; 321: 405-412
        • Jeppesen J
        • Hein HO
        • Suadicani P
        • Gyntelberg F
        Triglyceride concentration and ischemic heart disease: An eight-year follow-up in the Copenhagen Male Study.
        Circulation. 1998; 97: 1029-1036
        • Austin MA
        • Hokanson JE
        • Edwards KL
        Hypertriglyceridemia as a cardiovascular risk factor.
        Am J Cardiol. 1998; 81: 7B-12B
        • Rubins HB
        • Robins SJ
        • Collins D
        • et al.
        • Veterans Affairs High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Intervention Trial Study Group
        Gemfibrozil for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in men with low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
        N Engl J Med. 1999; 341: 410-418
        • Assmann G
        • Schulte H
        • Funke H
        • von Eckardstein A
        The emergence of triglycerides as a significant independent risk factor in coronary artery disease.
        Eur Heart J. 1998; 19 (Suppl M): M8-M14
        • Dichtl W
        • Ares MP
        • Stollenwerk M
        • et al.
        In vivo stimulation of vascular plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 production by very low-density lipoprotein involves transcription factor binding to a VLDL-responsive element.
        Thromb Haemost. 2000; 84: 706-711
        • Raman M
        • Nesto RW
        Heart disease in diabetes mellitus.
        Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 1996; 25: 425-438
        • Eriksson P
        • Nilsson L
        • Karpe F
        • Hamsten A
        Very-low-density lipoprotein response element in the promoter region of the human plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 gene implicated in the impaired fibrinolysis of hypertriglyceridemia.
        Arterioscler T Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998; 18: 20-26
        • Nilsson L
        • Gafvels M
        • Musakka L
        • et al.
        VLDL activation of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) expression: Involvement of the VLDL receptor.
        J Lipid Res. 1999; 40: 913-919
        • Sobel BE
        • Woodcock-Mitchell J
        • Schneider DJ
        • et al.
        Increased plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 in coronary artery atherectomy specimens from type 2 diabetic compared with nondiabetic patients: A potential factor predisposing to thrombosis and its persistence.
        Circulation. 1998; 97: 2213-2221
        • Kato K
        • Satoh H
        • Endo Y
        • et al.
        Thiazolidinediones down-regulate plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 expression in human vascular endothelial cells: A possible role for PPARgamma in endothelial function.
        Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999; 258: 431-435
        • National Cholesterol Education Program
        Second report of the Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel II).
        Circulation. 1994; 89: 1333-1445
        • Concato J
        • Shah N
        • Horwitz RI
        Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs.
        N Engl J Med. 2000; 342: 1887-1892
        • Benson K
        • Hartz AJ
        A comparison of observational studies and randomized, controlled trials.
        N Engl J Med. 2000; 342: 1878-1886