Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 22, ISSUE 5, P641-652, May 2000

The effect of new and continuing prescription drug use on cost: A longitudinal analysis of chronic and seasonal utilization

  • Kathleen A Fairman
    Correspondence
    Address correspondence to: Kathleen A. Fairman, MA, Outcomes Research Manager, Health Management Services Department, Express Scripts, Inc., 1700 North Desert Drive, Tempe, AZ 85281.
    Affiliations
    Express Scripts, Inc., Tempe, Arizona, USA
    Search for articles by this author
      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.
      Abstract

      Objective

      To provide basic information about 2 factors contributing to rising prescription drug costs—utilization trends and product selection

      Background

      Prescription drug costs have risen sharply in recent years, and continued growth is expected. There is little consensus about appropnate cost-management strategies, in part because quantitative data on the causes and implications of increased drug costs are lacking.

      Methods

      This study followed 463,820 continuously enrolled adult (≥18 years of age on January 1, 1996) utilizers of 15 chronic or seasonal therapeutic classes for 2.5 years (January 1996 through June 1998) using a pharmacy benefit manager's multiple-payor claims database. Outcome measures included (1) change in utilization rate, (2) relationship between new use and utilization growth, (3) stability of the treated population (ie, mostly long-term use vs high rates of turnover), and (4) product mix changes (ie, cost per dispensed day for 1996 vs 1997 and for new vs continuing users, controlling for inflation).

      Results

      Of the 463,820 utilizers, 97% were commercially insured and 3% enrolled in Medicare risk plans; 40% were enrolled in managed care and the remainder covered by indemnity insurance. Rates of growth and turnover varied substantially by class. The highest 2-year utilization rate change was 66.7% for antihyperlipidemic agents; change was <10% in only 3 classes. Across classes, an average of 38.7% of 1997 users were new (ie, no use in 1996) and an average of 34.0% of 1996 users were dropouts (ie, no use in 1997). Utilization growth depended heavily on treatment continuation; classes with high dropout rates (eg, antirheumatic, antiasthmatic) did not have high growth rates, even with high rates of new use. In most classes, costs were not higher for new than for continuing users. In some classes, however (eg, antipsychotic, antidiabetic), both new and continuing users increased their use of newer, more expensive products.

      Conclusions

      Because factors underlying rising prescription drug costs vary by therapeutic class, cost-containment strategies should address these differences. Further research is needed to assess the clinical and economic costs and benefits of rapid growth in the utilization of certain therapeutic classes.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Therapeutics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Mehl B
        • Santell JP
        Projecting future drug expenditures—1999.
        Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 1999; 56: 31-39
        • Navarro RP
        Dissecting drug cost trends.
        Med Interface. 1997; 10: 80-82
        • Teitelbaum F
        • Parker A
        • Martinez R
        • Roe C
        Express Scripts Drug Trend Report. Express Scripts, Inc, St. Louis, Mo1999: 2-3
        • Teitelbaum F
        • Parker A
        • Martinez R
        • Roe C
        Express Scripts Drug Trend Report. Express Scripts, Inc, St. Louis, Mo1999: 12
        • Teitelbaum F
        • Parker A
        • Martinez R
        • Roe C
        Express Scripts Drug Trend Report. Express Scripts, Inc, St. Louis, Mo1999: 23-24
        • Teitelbaum F
        • Parker A
        • Martinez R
        • Roe C
        Express Scripts Drug Trend Report. Express Scripts, Inc, St. Louis, Mo1999: 39
        • Braden BR
        • Cowan CA
        • Lazenby HC
        • The US Health Care Financing Administration
        • Office of the Actuary
        • et al.
        National health expenditures, 1997.
        Health Care Financ Rev. 1998; 20: 83-126
        • Kane NM
        Pharmaceutical cost containment and innovation in the United States.
        Health Policy. 1997; 41 (Suppl): S71-S89
        • Kozma CM
        The effect of new pharmaceutical agents on pharmacy budgets.
        Manag Care Interface. 1999; 12: 77-78
        • McCarthy R
        A behind-the-numbers look at rising Rx costs.
        Bus Health. 1998; 6: 29
        • McCarthy R
        A behind-the-numbers look at rising Rx costs.
        Bus Health. 1998; 6: 32-35
        • Ryan BA
        The rising cost of pharmaceuticals. An industry observer's perspective.
        Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 1993; 50: S3-S4
        • Lyles A
        • Palumbo FB
        The effect of managed care on prescription drug costs and benefits.
        Pharmacoeconomics. 1999; 15: 129-140
        • Public Citizen's Health Research Group
        Comments on: Food and Drug Administration. Attitudinal and behavioral effects of direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs HRG Publication #1460. September 28, 1998; (Submitted on) (Accessed February 28, 2000)
        • Lipsky MS
        • Taylor CA
        The opinions and experiences of family physicians regarding direct-to-consumer advertisingJ.
        Fam Pract. 1997; 45: 495-499
        • Bloom BS
        • Jacobs JC
        OST effects of restricting cost-effective therapy.
        Med Care. 1985; 3: 872-880
        • Burstall ML
        Copayments for medicines: How much should patients pay?.
        Pharmacoeconomics. 1994; 6: 187-192
        • Levy RA
        Prescription cost sharing: Economic and health impacts, and implications for health policy.
        Pharmacoeconomics. 1992; 2: 219-237
        • Soumerai SB
        • Ross-Degnan D
        • Fortess EE
        • Abelson J
        A critical analysis of studies of state drug reimbursement policies: Research m need of discipline.
        Milbank Q. 1993; 71: 217-252
        • Mason J
        • Freemantle N
        The dilemma of new drugs: Are costs rising faster than effectiveness?.
        Pharmacoeconomics. 1998; 13: 653-657
        • Winslow R
        Copayments rise for prescriptions.
        Wall Street Journal. January 12, 1999; : B1
        • Winslow R
        Copayments rise for prescriptions.
        Wall Street Journal. January 12, 1999; : B4
        • Medi-Span
        Generic Product Identifier.
        Medi-Span, Indianapolis, Ind1998
        • Weiss K
        • Gergen P
        • Wagener D
        Breathing better or wheezing worse? The changing epidemiology of asthma morbidity and mortality.
        Annu Rev Public Health. 1993; 14: 493-494
        • Stephenson BJ
        • Rowe BH
        • Haynes MB
        • et al.
        Is this patient taking the treatment as prescribed?.
        JAMA. 1993; 269: 2779-2781