Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 21, ISSUE 9, P1578-1588, September 1999

Economic assessment of three antimicrobial therapies for uncomplicated urinary tract infection in women

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Abstract

      This retrospective cohort study used North Carolina Medicaid paid-claims data to assess clinical and economic outcomes of treatments for urinary tract infection (UTI). The study population comprised female Medicaid recipients, between 15 and 64 years of age, with a paid claim filed for a primary diagnosis of UTI or acute UTI from January 1 to June 30, 1994, who were treated with ciprofloxacin, nitrofurantoin, or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMZ). Patients had follow-up for 6 months after the primary diagnosis. Patients who did not receive further treatment for UTI with 1 of the 3 drugs within 30 days after initial treatment were assumed to be cured. Costs were measured as the sum of reimbursements for UTI-related medical services and drug treatments. Outcomes for 409 patients were assessed. Cure rates of initial treatment with ciprofloxacin, nitrofurantoin, and TMP/SMZ were 81%, 88%, and 93%, respectively. Cost-effectiveness ratios of initial treatment with the 3 drugs were $150.80, $81.20, and $69.00, respectively. When efficacy rates generated from published randomized clinical studies were applied, costeffectiveness ratios for the 3 drugs were $130.96, $86.17, and $72.00, respectively. A decision model of treatment pattern and associated costs is presented. Several patient variables indicate that the ciprofloxacin group included more severe cases of UTI than did the other groups. Study limitations, confounders, and future research suggestions are discussed. Our results show that treatment for >7 days results in a better cure rate regardless of the drug used than does treatment for ≤7 days and that TMP/SMZ is the most cost-effective of the 3 drugs for UTI or acute UTI.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Therapeutics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Johnson CC
        Definitions, classification, and clinical presentation of urinary tract infections.
        Med Clin North Am. 1991; 75: 241-252
        • Powers RD
        New directions in the diagnosis and therapy of urinary tract infections.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 164: 1387-1389
        • Stamm WE
        • Hooton TM
        Management of urinary tract infections in adults.
        N Engl J Med. 1993; 329: 1328-1334
        • Patton JP
        • Nash DB
        • Abrutyn E
        Urinary tract infection: Economic considerations.
        Med Clin North Am. 1991; 75: 495-513
        • Woodwell DA
        Office visits to urologists: United States, 1989–1990.
        in: Advance Data from Vital and Health Statistics, no. 234. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, Md1995: 8
        • Thomson KS
        • Sanders WE
        • Sanders CC
        USA resistance patterns among UTI pathogens.
        J Antimicrob Chemother. 1994; 33: 9-15
        • Grüneberg RN
        Changes in urinary pathogens and their antimicrobial sensitiv-ities, 1971–1992.
        J Antimicrob Chemother. 1994; 33: 1-8
        • Ansbach RK
        • Dybus KR
        • Bergeson R
        Uncomplicated E coli urinary tract infection in college women: A retrospective study of E coli sensitivities to commonly prescribed antibiotics.
        J Am Coll Health. 1995; 43: 183-185
        • Carlson KJ
        • Mulley AG
        Management of acute dysuria. A decision-analysis model of alternative strategies.
        Ann Intern Med. 1985; 102: 244-249
        • Hooton TM
        • Winter C
        • Tiu F
        • Stamm WE
        Randomized comparative trial and cost analysis of 3-day antimicrobial regimens for treatment of acute cystitis in women.
        JAMA. 1995; 273: 41-45
      1. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Hyattsville, Md1998: 135
        • Boyko EJ
        • Iravani A
        • Silverman MH
        • et al.
        Randomized, controlled trial of a 10day course of amifloxacin versus trimetho-prim-sulfamethoxazole in the treatment of acute, uncomplicated urinary tract infection. Amifloxacin Multi-Center Trial Group.
        Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990; 34: 665-667
        • Henry NK
        • Schultz HJ
        • Grubbs NC
        • et al.
        Comparison of ciprofloxacin and cotrimoxazole in the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection in women.
        J Antimicrob Chemother. 1986; 18: 103-106
        • Iravani A
        • Richard GA
        • Baer H
        Trimethoprim once daily vs nitrofurantoin in treat-ment of acute urinary tract infections in young women, with special reference to periurethral, vaginal, and fecal flora.
        Rev Infect Dis. 1982; 4: 378-386
        • Iravani A
        • Tice AD
        • McCarty J
        • et al.
        Shortcourse ciprofloxacin treatment of acute un-complicated urinary tract infection in women. The minimum effective dose. The Urinary Tract Infection Study Group.
        Arch Intern Med. 1995; 155: 485-494
        • Iravani A
        Multicenter study of singledose and multiple-dose fleroxacin versus ciprofloxacin in the treatment of uncom-plicated urinary tract infections.
        Am J Med. 1993; 94: 89S-96S
        • Lightstone BL
        • Greaves WE
        • Humphries JM
        Comparison of Mictral with amoxycillin, trimethoprim and nitrofurantoin in the treatment of acute cystitis.
        Br J Clin Pract. 1988; 42: 283-288
        • Masterton RG
        • Bochsler JA
        High-dosage co-amoxiclav in a single dose versus 7 days of co-trimoxazole as treatment of uncomplicated lower urinary tract infection in women.
        J Antimicrob Chemother. 1995; 35: 129-137
        • Naber KG
        • Thyroff-Friesinger U
        Fosfomycin trometamol versus ofloxacin/cotrimoxazole as single dose therapy of acute uncomplicated urinary tract infection in females: A multicentre study.
        Infection. 1990; 18: S70-S76
        • Pfau A
        • Sacks TG
        Single dose quinolone treatment in acute uncomplicated urinary tract infection in women.
        J Urol. 1993; 149: 532-534
        • Reid G
        • Bruce AW
        • Taylor M
        Influence of three-day antimicrobial therapy and lactobacillus vaginal suppositories on recurrence of urinary tract infections,.
        Clin Ther. 1992; 14: 11-16
        • Spencer RC
        • Moseley DJ
        • Greensmith MJ
        Nitrofurantoin modified release versus trimethoprim or co-trimoxazole in the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection in general practice.
        J Antimicrob Chemother. 1994; 33: 121-129
        • Stein GE
        • Philip E
        Comparison of threeday temafloxacin with seven-day ciprofloxacin treatment of urinary tract infections in women.
        J Fam Pract. 1992; 34: 180-184
        • Trienekens TAM
        • Stobberingh EE
        • Winkens RAG
        • Houben AW
        Different lengths of treatment with co-trimoxazole for acute uncomplicated urinary tract infections in women.
        Br Med J. 1989; 299: 1319-1322
      2. Physicians' Desk Reference®. 50th ed. Medical Economics Com-pany, Montvale, NJ1996: 593
      3. Physicians' Desk Reference®. 50th ed. Medical Economics Com-pany, Montvale, NJ1996: 1989
      4. Physicians' Desk Reference®. 50th ed. Medical Economics Com-pany, Montvale, NJ1996: 2086
      5. USPDI 18th Edition.
        US Pharmacopeial Convention, Rockville, Md1996
      6. Drug Facts and Comparisons.
        Facts and Comparisons. 1994; (St. Louis, Mo): 340k
      7. Drug Facts and Comparisons.
        Facts and Comparisons. 1994; (St. Louis, Mo): 432
      8. Drug Facts and Comparisons.
        Facts and Comparisons. 1994; (St. Louis, Mo): 409a-409b
        • Mockenhaupt M
        • Schopf E
        Epidemiology of drug-induced severe skin reactions.
        Sem Cutaneous Med Surg. 1996; 15: 236-243