This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.
Abstract
Many patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension initially receive beta-blocker
monotherapy to control intraocular pressure (IOP), but some of these patients will
require an additional IOP-lowering agent within 1 year. This active-controlled, double-masked,
randomized, multicenter, 12-week study compared the effectiveness and tolerability
of dorzolamide hydrochloride ophthalmic solution 2% TID with those of pilocarpine
hydrochloride 2% QID as adjunctive therapy to timolol maleate ophthalmic gel-forming
solution (TG) 0.5% QD as measured by changes in IOP and occurrence of adverse events.
One hundred ninety-four patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension participated
in this study. Their mean age was ~63 years. Slightly more than one half were white,
and approximately one third were black. After a 3-week run-in period during which
all patients received TG 0.5% QD, patients with an IOP of ≥22 mm Hg at the morning
trough measure- ment were randomly assigned to receive additional double-masked therapy
with either dorzolamide or pilocarpine. The primary outcome measure was the mean change
in IOP at the morning trough measurement from baseline to week 12. The secondary outcome
measure was the mean change in IOP at the morning peak measurement from baseline to
week 12. There was no significant difference in IOP-lowering effect between the 2
drugs at either morning trough or morning peak. The mean change in IOP at morning
trough was −3.17 mm Hg (−12%) in patients receiving dorzolamide; it was −3.45 mm Hg
(−13%) in patients receiving pilocarpine. The mean change in IOP at morning peak was
−2.25 mm Hg (−10%) for patients who received dorzolamide and −2.51 mm Hg (−11%) for
those who received pilocarpine. In the pilocarpine group, 62 (63%) patients experienced
≥1 adverse event compared with 35 (36%) patients in the dorzolamide group (P < 0.001). Twenty-one (21%) patients in the pilocarpine group discontinued treatment
because of an adverse event compared with 2 (2%) patients in the dorzolamide group
(P < 0.001). These results demonstrate that dorzolamide and pilocarpine were equally
effective as adjunctive therapy in lowering IOP but that dorzolamide was better tolerated.
Key words
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Clinical TherapeuticsAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Textbook of Glaucoma. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, Md1998 4th ed.
- A double-masked, randomized 1-year study comparing dorzolamide (Trusopt) , timolol, and betaxolol.Arch Ophthalmol. 1995; 113: 1009-1016
- The efficacy of dorzolamide, a topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitor, in combination with timolol in the treatment of patients with open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.Clin Ther. 1996; 18: 460-465
- The use of dorzolamide and pilocarpine as adjunctive therapy in patients with elevated intraocular pressure: The Dorzolamide Additivity Study Group.Ophthalmology. 1996; 103: 1283-1293
- Comparison of quality of life and patient preference of dorzolamide and pilocarpine as adjunctive therapy to timolol in the treatment of glaucoma.J Glaucoma. 1995; 4: 306-313
- Dorzolamide versus pilocarpine as adjunctive therapies to timolol: A comparison of patient preference and impact on daily life.Clin Ther. 1996; 18: 821-832
Article info
Publication history
Accepted:
July 28,
1999
Identification
Copyright
© 1999 Published by Elsevier Inc.