Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 17, ISSUE 2, P270-279, March 1995

A comparison of captopril and digoxin in the treatment of patients with mild-to-moderate chronic congestive heart failure

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Abstract

      In a double-blind study, 116 patients (mean age, 57.6 years) with mild-to-moderate chronic congestive heart failure who were in sinus rhythm were randomly assigned to receive 25 mg of captopril were daily (up to 50 mg twice daily, if needed) plus hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) (group 1) or 0.1 mg of digoxin twice daily plus HCTZ (group 2) for 12 months. During a 3-to 4-week pretreatment stabilization period, group 1 received a mean of 37.7 mg of HCTZ daily and group 2 received 34.9 mg daily. After 6 weeks and 12 months of treatment, improvement was noted in both treatment groups on five measures of cardiac function: exercise tolerance, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), ejection fraction, blood pressure, and heart rate. At 12 months, significantly greater improvement was noted in group 1 than in group 2 in exercise tolerance (from 329 seconds at baseline to 445 seconds at 12 months in group 1 and from 353 to 427 seconds in group 2; P < 0.05); LVEDD (from 60.5 to 56.5 mm in group 1 and from 60.3 to 57.9 mm in group 2; P < 0.05); and blood pressure (from 103.5 to 95.6 mm Hg in group 1 and from 101.9 to 97.0 mm Hg in group 2; P < 0.03). Clinical severity (New York Heart Association class) improved in both groups; 52% of the patients in group 1 and 41% in group 2 dropped an average of one functional class (P < 0.01). The results indicate that captopril combined with a diuretic is an effective initial treatment for patients with mild-to-moderate congestive heart failure.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Therapeutics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Timmis AD
        Modern treatment of heart failure.
        BMJ. 1988; 297 (Editorial): 83-84
        • Smith TW
        • Braunwald E
        • Kelly RA
        The management of heart failure.
        in: Braunwald E 4th ed. Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. WB Saunders, Philadelphia1992: 464-519
        • Fleg JL
        • Gottlieb SH
        • Lakatta EG
        Is digoxin really important in treatment of compensated heart failure? A placebo-controlled crossover study in patients with sinus rhythm.
        Am J Med. 1982; 73: 244-250
        • Guyatt GH
        • Sullivan MJJ
        • Fallen EL
        • et al.
        A controlled trial of digoxin in congestive heart failure.
        Am J Cardiol. 1988; 61: 371-375
        • Gheorghiade M
        • Beller GA
        Effects of discontinuing maintenance digoxin therapy in patients with ischemic heart disease and congestive heart failure in sinus rhythm.
        Am J Cardiol. 1983; 51: 1243-1250
        • Captopril-Digoxin Multicenter Research Group
        Comparative effects of therapy with captopril and digoxin in patients with mild to moderate heart failure.
        JAMA. 1988; 259: 539-544
        • CONSENSUS Trial Study Group
        Effects of enalapril on mortality in severe congestive heart failure: Results of the Cooperative North Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study (CONSENSUS).
        NEJM. 1987; 316: 1429-1435
        • Fonarow G
        • Chelimsky-Fallick C
        • Stevenson LW
        • et al.
        Survival with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition versus direct vasodilation for the same hemodynamic goals in advanced heart failure: 106 randomized patients.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991; 17 (Abstract): 274A
        • Boccanelli A
        • Zachara E
        • Liberatore SM
        • et al.
        Addition of captopril versus increasing diuretics in moderate but deteriorating heart failure: A double-blind comparative trial.
        Postgrad Med J. 1986; 62 (Suppl 1): 184-187
        • Captopril Multicenter Research Group
        A placebo-controlled trial of captopril in refractory chronic congestive heart failure.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 1983; 2: 755-763
        • Cohn JN
        • Johnson G
        • Ziesche S
        • et al.
        A comparison of enalapril with hydralazine-isosorbide dinitrate in the treatment of chronic congestive heart failure.
        NEJM. 1991; 325: 303-310
        • Cohn JN
        • Archibald DG
        • Ziesche S
        • et al.
        Effect of vasodilator therapy on mortality in chronic congestive heart failure: Results of a Veterans Administration Cooperative Study.
        NEJM. 1986; 314: 1547-1552
        • Davies RF
        • Beanlands DS
        • Nadeau C
        • et al.
        Enalapril versus digoxin in patients with congestive heart failure: A multicenter study.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991; 18: 1602-1609
        • Di Bianco R
        A large-scale trial of captopril for mild to moderate heart failure in the primary care setting.
        Clin Cardiol. 1991; 14: 676-682
        • Di Bianco R
        Survival in patients with heart failure: Focus on captopril.
        Clin Ther. 1988; 10: 204-215
        • Di Bianco R
        Captopril in congestive heart failure.
        Herz. 1987; 12 (Suppl 1): 27-37
        • Francis GS
        Heart failure management: The impact of drug therapy on survival.
        Am Heart J. 1988; 115 (Editorial): 699-702
        • Just H
        Treatment of heart failure: Importance of vasodilator therapy.
        Herz. 1987; 12 (In German): 22-26
        • Kleber FX
        Influence of captopril on life expectancy in chronic congestive heart failure.
        Herz. 1987; 12 (In German): 38-45
        • Kleber FX
        • Laube A
        • Osterkorn K
        • et al.
        Captopril in mild to moderate heart failure over 18 months: Effects on morbidity and mortality.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987; 9 (Abstract): 42A
        • Lilly L
        • Dzau VJ
        • Williams GH
        • et al.
        Captopril vs hydralazine in advanced congestive heart failure: Comparison of one year survival.
        Circulation. 1985; 72 (Abstract): 408
        • Newman TJ
        • Maskin CS
        • Dennick LG
        • et al.
        Effects of captopril on survival in patients with heart failure.
        Am J Med. 1988; 84 (Suppl 3A): 140-144
        • Rudra T
        • Bayer AJ
        • Bayley N
        • et al.
        Captopril in elderly patients with mild to moderate heart failure.
        J Clin Exp Gerontol. 1989; 11: 29-40
        • SOLVD Investigators
        Effect of enalapril on survival in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fractions and congestive heart failure.
        NEJM. 1991; 325: 293-302
        • SOLVD Investigators
        Studies of left ventricular dysfunction (SOLVD)-rationale, design, and methods: Two trials that evaluate the effect of enalapril in patients with reduced ejection fraction.
        Am J Cardiol. 1990; 66: 315-322
        • Wilkes NPF
        • Barin E
        • Hoschl R
        • et al.
        Comparison of the immediate and long-term effects of captopril and isosorbide dinitrate as adjunctive treatment in mild heart failure.
        Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1989; 28: 427-434
        • Kleber FX
        • Niemöller L
        • Fischer M
        • et al.
        Influence of severity of heart failure on the efficacy of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition.
        Am J Cardiol. 1991; 68: 121D-126D
        • Pfeffer MA
        • Lamas GA
        • Vaughan DE
        • et al.
        Effect of captopril on progressive ventricular dilatation after anterior myocardial infarction.
        NEJM. 1988; 319: 80-86
        • Dzau V
        • Braunwald E
        • et al.
        Resolved and unresolved issues in the prevention and treatment of coronary artery disease: A workshop consensus treatment.
        Am Heart J. 1991; 121: 1244-1263
        • Pfeffer MA
        • Braunwald E
        Ventricular enlargement following infarction is a modifiable process.
        Am J Cardiol. 1991; 68: 127D-131D
        • Moyé LA
        • Pfeffer MA
        • Braunwald E
        • et al.
        Rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of the survival and ventricular enlargement trial.
        Am J Cardiol. 1991; 68: 700-779
      1. Capoten reduces mortality 17% in post-MI patients without overt heart failure.
        FDC Reports (“The Pink Sheet”). 1992; (April 20:T&G-6)
        • Kirlin PC
        • Grekin R
        • Das S
        • et al.
        Neurohumoral activation during exercise in congestive heart failure.
        Am J Med. 1986; 81: 623-629
        • Levine TB
        • Franciosa JA
        • Cohn JN
        Acute and long-term response to an oral converting-enzyme inhibitor, captopril, in congestive heart failure.
        Circulation. 1980; 62: 35-41
        • Manthey J
        • Dietz R
        • Hackenthal E
        • et al.
        Left ventricular function and vasoconstrictor mechanisms in patients with chronic heart failure.
        Z Kardiol. 1984; 73 (In German): 279-288
        • Bayliss J
        • Norell M
        • Canepa-Anson R
        • et al.
        Untreated heart failure: Clinical and neuroendocrine effects of introducing diuretics.
        Br Heart J. 1987; 57: 17-22
        • Lee WH
        • Packer M
        Prognostic importance of serum sodium concentration and its modification by converting-enzyme inhibition in patients with severe chronic heart failure.
        Circulation. 1986; 73: 257-267